Civil Commitment - the American Experience

By Anfang, Stuart A.; Appelbaum, Paul S. | The Israel Journal of Psychiatry and Related Sciences, July 1, 2006 | Go to article overview

Civil Commitment - the American Experience


Anfang, Stuart A., Appelbaum, Paul S., The Israel Journal of Psychiatry and Related Sciences


Abstract: The evolution of U.S. civil commitment law needs to be understood within the context of changes in psychiatry and medicine, as well as larger social policy and economic changes. American civil commitment law has reflected the swinging pendulum of social attitudes towards civil commitment, oscillating between more and less restriction for both procedural and substantive standards. These standards have evolved from a "need for treatment" approach to a "dangerousness" rationale, and now may be moving to a position in which these justifications are combined, particularly in the context of involuntary outpatient commitment. Civil commitment in the United States has been shaped by multiple factors, including sensitivity to civil rights, public perception of psychiatry, availability of resources, and larger economic pressures. We suggest that current American commitment practice is influenced more by economic factors and social perceptions of mental illness than by changing legal standards.

Introduction

Involuntary civil commitment is often considered the primary intersection of psychiatry and law, and is typically one of the most publicly visible and contentious roles of psychiatrists within the larger society. In the United States, the legal struggles and changes in the process of civil commitment over the past 200 years reflect social ambivalence about the extent to which an individual's right to liberty can be restricted for the ostensible sake of protecting his interests or the interests of others (1). The evolution of U.S. civil commitment law needs to be understood within the context of changes in psychiatry and medicine, as well as larger social policy and economic changes. American civil commitment law has reflected the swinging pendulum of social attitudes towards civil commitment, oscillating between more and less restriction for both procedural and substantive standards. As Israeli psychiatrists, jurists and policy makers consider their own civil commitment laws, it may be helpful to consider the American experience (2, 3).

In this article, we briefly trace the historical evolution of civil commitment in the United States, describe some of the past and current controversies, reflect on the empirical data relevant to these processes, and offer analysis and perspective that may inform other nations working to improve their own civil commitment laws (4).

History

In Colonial times (i.e., pre-1776) and the early years of the United States, there was little formal legal regulation of the care of the mentally ill - likely due in part to the few options for treatment or institutional care (5). Mentally ill persons who could not care for themselves and lacked family care and support were typically ignored or managed in jails or almshouses for the poor. This approach had no real therapeutic aspects, but served purely as containment or punishment. From a social perspective, the practices were driven largely by the interests of public safety (the "police power" of the state), with little consideration of treatment or the rights and needs of mentally ill persons. Conditions in jails and almshouses were universally poor, with only basic sustenance in typically filthy settings, invariably mixing the mentally ill with criminals, vagrants, the retarded, the senile, and other social outcasts.

As jails and almshouses became crowded with mentally ill persons, there were some early efforts to develop private psychiatric units and hospitals, sometimes with public funds, albeit with little legal regulation. The first psychiatric admission in the colonies occurred in Philadelphia in 1752; by the early decades of the 19th century, a few small private and public facilities had developed across the states. Admissions were involuntary ("insane" persons were considered by definition to be unable to recognize their own interests and make decisions about hospitalization), typically initiated by family or friends, and the length of stay was linked to ongoing private financial support.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Civil Commitment - the American Experience
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.