A Comparative Anatomy of Urban Social Conflict

By Sharp, Elaine B. | Political Research Quarterly, June 1997 | Go to article overview

A Comparative Anatomy of Urban Social Conflict


Sharp, Elaine B., Political Research Quarterly


This study explores local government's roles in "culture wars"-i.e., morals-based controversies such as those involving abortion clinic protest, anti-pornography crusades, debates over the extension of civil rights protections to gays, and regulation of hate group activities. Three particular roles are highlighted for analysis: hyperactive responsiveness, entrepreneurial instigation, and repression. Both deductive and inductive approaches are used to develop a viable set of hypotheses linking the appearance of those roles to variation in local governing institutions. The rational choice approach to the new institutionalism provides an analytical framework which, when coupled with insights from the study of social movements and local political entrepreneurs, allows for the derivation of hypotheses. Comparative analysis of cases of culture war controversy are used as plausibility probes to ground and further refine the hypotheses.

In addition to the important tasks and policies that are a part of economic development and routine service delivery, urban governments are responsible for social conflict management and order maintenance-a straightforward observation that is never far from the consciousness of local officials. However, urbanists within political science have exhibited a relative neglect of this topic, even though local governments have increasingly been engulfed in especially volatile social conflicts surrounding such phenomena as abortion clinic protest, debates over the extension of civil rights protections to gays, anti-pornography crusades, and the control of hate groups. These are examples of the social conflicts that Hunter (1991) calls "culture wars." They are characterized by intense social conflict centered on fundamental issues of morality and social justice, and they have raised special concerns because of the potential for violence that often accompanies such conflicts (Hunter 1994).

Even though they are episodic, these culture-war-style controversies are significant problems for urban governance, whether from the perspective of the normative questions that are involved or the lives and property that can be damaged and destroyed if they explode into violence or the effects of media-covered strident controversy on community image or the consequences for the electoral fortunes of local officials or for urban leaders' capacity to tackle other policy issues. Initial research, based upon secondary analysis of a variety of cases of culture wars (see Appendix A for a summary of the cases), suggests a number of interesting roles that local governments play in such controversies (Sharp 1996). Three of those roles-hyperactive responsiveness, repression, and entrepreneurial instigation-are the focus of analysis in this article.1Repression involves action taken by authorities to "either depress collective action or raise the cost of its two main preconditions-the organization and mobilization of opinion. . ." (Tarrow 1994: 95). Hyperactive responsiveness, a newly developed concept derived from analysis of several of the cases, involves aggressive action in support of challengers of the status quo and is characterized by precipitous decision making, the bypassing of normal procedures, disregard of legal or constitutional issues, or some combination of the above (Sharp 1996: 749). Finally, entrepreneurial instigation is action by local officials, acting as agenda-setters, deliberately to mobilize the community on a culture-war issue. The task of this article is to explore how variation in the institutions of local government shapes the choices of local officials and hence the adoption of these roles.

THEORETICAL OVERVIEW

Inquiry concerning these culture wars is problematic for urbanists within political science for several reasons, the most important of which is the difficulty of fitting them into the theoretical frameworks that have been so important in other aspects of urban politics. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

A Comparative Anatomy of Urban Social Conflict
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.