Emergency Management in the Courts: Trends after September 11 and Hurricane Katrina*

By Birkland, Thomas A.; Schneider, Carrie A. | Justice System Journal, January 1, 2007 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Emergency Management in the Courts: Trends after September 11 and Hurricane Katrina*

Birkland, Thomas A., Schneider, Carrie A., Justice System Journal

This article is an overview of trends in emergency preparedness and management in the courts, with a particular focus on trends following the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks and Hurricane Katrina in 2005. We describe the common features of disasters and of the management guidance available to courts. Of particular note is the degree to which Katrina was a catastrophic event that affected a broad geographical area, while the September 11 attacks constituted a major disaster but without the widespread damage done by a major hurricane or earthquake. While much emergency planning is based in anecdote and experience, we argue that there are important research questions contained in many plans and planning-guidance documents relating to the nature and extent of emergency planning in the courts, its variability across jurisdictions, and the extent to which other branches of government consider court security a priority. Further research in these questions would better inform efforts to plan and to encourage planning for extreme events that could affect the courts.

The courts serve a central role in our constitutional democracy. Under the rule of law, people rely very heavily on the courts and on courthouses, all of which are subject to various natural, technological, or humanly caused disasters or catastrophes. Preparedness for such events is a vital government function, but it is particularly important for the courts because they must remain open to the extent possible to ensure that all people's legal rights are protected.

This article summarizes significant managerial trends in disaster management and the courts. September 11 plays a prominent role in this discussion, because much of what we present here is a summary of court emergency-planning efforts that were a direct result of September 11 (see Leibowitz, 2001). September 11 was a major focusing event (Birkland, 1997) that focused more attention on emergency management than any other event in the previous twenty-five years. The other disaster examined here is Hurricane Katrina, which so damaged both state and federal courts (as well as New Orleans and its environs generally) that many courts were not yet fully operational more than a year after the disaster.

This article thus expands upon an earlier report prepared for the Center for Court Innovation (Birkland, 2004) by considering the range of planning guidance and actions that have been taken by courts to address actual or potential disaster. The research presented here is based on secondary sources, particularly the legal press, although much of the discussion about the courts in New Orleans and in New York City after the September 11 attacks comes from interviews with court officials. The article concludes with a brief consideration of research questions that have arisen from the September 11 and Hurricane Katrina disasters; we argue that what has heretofore been anecdotal evidence of different levels of planning and preparedness could be better understood with systematic research.


Since at least 1989, in the wake of the Loma Prieta earthquake in California, the power of natural and humanly caused disasters to disrupt the courts' business has been understood (see generally Birkland, 1998; Bovum, 1998; Wasby, 1998a, b; Salokar, 1998; Pedeliski, 1998). A number of major disasters, and one catastrophic natural disaster, Hurricane Katrina, have had a substantial influence on the administration of justice in the communities where they struck (see Table 1).

All the events noted in Table 1 differ in important ways. However, they also have several elements in common, including the significant disruption of normal functions of government and the shifting of priorities to respond to the disaster; considerable economic disruption, ranging from business interruption to labor shortages caused by evacuations; and the extent of social disruption, including deaths and injuries, the displacement of people from their homes, uncertainty about future risks, and uncertainty about how people's lives would be during and after the recovery from the event.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Emergency Management in the Courts: Trends after September 11 and Hurricane Katrina*


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?