Adopting Local Environmental Institutions: Environmental Need and Economic Constraints

By Meyer, Stephen M.; Konisky, David M. | Political Research Quarterly, March 2007 | Go to article overview

Adopting Local Environmental Institutions: Environmental Need and Economic Constraints


Meyer, Stephen M., Konisky, David M., Political Research Quarterly


Communities are increasingly turning to local environmental institutions (LEIs) to address unmet environmental challenges. Yet there has been very little empirical analysis of LEIs, and we know surprisingly little about their origins. In this article, the authors use a rational choice framework to examine the incentives and disincentives communities face in deciding whether to establish LEIs. In particular, the authors study the decision of communities to adopt local wetlands bylaws under the Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act. Using event history analysis, the authors find strong evidence that environmental need, economic attributes, and economic constraints have strong effects on the impulse of communities to adopt LEIs.

Keywords: local environmental institutions; policy adoption, wetlands protection

1. Introduction

The past decade has been a period of major reevaluation of U.S. environmental policy. Academic scholarship (e.g., Davies and Mazurek 1998; Chertow and Esty 1997), blue-ribbon commissions (e.g., Center for Strategic and International Studies [CSIS] 1998; National Academy of Public Administration [NAPA] 1997; President's Council on Sustainable Development [PCSD] 1996), and politicians (e.g., Bush 2003; Clinton and Gore 1995) alike have recommended that the command-and-control regulation central to the existing environmental protection system be supplemented with, if not replaced by, more flexible approaches. In addition to the broader application of market-based mechanisms and voluntary approaches to pollution control and natural resource management, reform advocates have called for greater resort to place-based solutions (e.g., Shutkin 2000; Mazmanian and Kraft 1999; John 1994).

This momentum toward place-based solutions and the creation of local environmental institutions (LEIs) is fueled by the desire to make environmental policy more responsive to local values and interests and to move away from "one-size-fits-all" environmental programs crafted by distant government agencies. By giving communities more say in environmental decisions, advocates of LEIs argue, policies will meet less resistance and generate stronger environmental protection with lower transaction costs.

Despite all of their perceived benefits, not all communities are eager to create LEIs. What accounts for early adopters? Why do some communities fail to follow the lead of their neighbors in establishing LEIs? In this article, we search for evidence of systematic structural influences that explain why some communities choose to build LEIs while others do not. Specifically, we examine whether the adoption of LEIs fits the standard rational choice framework of incentives and disincentives facing community action, using the case of local wetlands protection in Massachusetts to test the arguments.

The article proceeds as follows. In the next section, we discuss several types of LEIs, differentiating between what is often considered the archetype-community-based environmental protection-and two alternative models of LEIs we study in this article. In section 3, we describe the system of local wetlands protection in Massachusetts. In section 4, we consider the incentives and disincentives facing communities in their decision as to whether to adopt a stronger type of LEI. In section 5, we present and discuss our regression results. Last, in section 6, we offer some brief conclusions.

2. Local Environmental Institutions

The best-known and most intensely studied type of LEI is often referred to as community-based environmental protection (CBEP).1 CBEP represents a myriad of activities in which communities take the lead in creating and implementing environmental protection. Although there is no authoritative definition of CBEP, there is considerable consensus about its defining characteristics.2

First, CBEP institutions are place based, providing the opportunity for policy to be informed by local knowledge and sensitive to the preferences and values of local actors (John 1994). …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Adopting Local Environmental Institutions: Environmental Need and Economic Constraints
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.