Who Wins Nominations and Why? an Updated Forecast of the Presidential Primary Vote

By Steger, Wayne P. | Political Research Quarterly, March 2007 | Go to article overview

Who Wins Nominations and Why? an Updated Forecast of the Presidential Primary Vote


Steger, Wayne P., Political Research Quarterly


This article builds on previous forecasts of the presidential primary vote by incorporating elite party endorsements and estimates of candidate electability. Elite endorsements are significant predictors of both parties' primary vote, but cash reserves are significant only for Democrats while Gallup poll results are significant only for Republicans. The model updated by the New Hampshire primary results indicates that the primary affects both parties' remaining primary vote, especially for Democrats. Republican nominations are largely predictable and determined mainly by effects occurring prior to the primaries, while Democratic nominations are relatively unpredictable before the primaries and are susceptible to momentum during the primaries.

Keywords: presidency; nominations; elections forecast; candidate endorsement

Political parties and presidential nominations are inseparably linked. The stakes are high for aspirants and party constituencies alike. The presidential nominee of a political party becomes the foremost spokesperson of the party (Tedesco 2001), the personified image of the party (Miller and Gronbeck 1994), the main selector of issues and policies for the party's general election campaign (Riker 1986), and a major factor in defining the ideological direction of a political party (e.g., Herrera 1995). Understanding why certain candidates get nominated is important for understanding several of the most important institutions in American politics. Why certain candidates get elected also matters for evaluating how democratic presidential nominations are. For example, how democratic are nominations if campaign contributors and party elites play bigger roles than does the mass party membership?

Previous models forecasting the presidential primary vote find that the main predictors are candidates' standing in preprimary national polls (Mayer 1996b, 2003) and cash reserves at the beginning of the primary season (Adkins and Dowdle 2000, 2001). These models, however, do not address two theoretically relevant factors that could improve the prediction of the presidential primary vote. One, forecasting models ignore the resurgence of the political party establishments as factors affecting presidential nominations. Steger and Davis (2000) and Cohen et al. (2002, 2003) argued that candidate endorsements by party elites affect primary voters' decisions by providing information about candidates' desirability. Second, forecasting models do not account for the effects of electability. At least some primary voters cast ballots strategically, taking into account their expectations for candidate performance in the general election (Brady and Johnston 1987; Abramowitz 1989; Abramson et al. 1992).

This study incorporates variables representing the central elements of these approaches into a forecasting model of the presidential primary vote. The study also compares a forecasting model using information from the preprimary period with a "momentum" model that incorporates preprimary year information updated by the results of the Iowa and New Hampshire nominating elections. The study is both explanatory and predictive. Given the importance of presidential nominations for the options of voters in the general election and the implications for governance after the election, it is worth figuring out who gets nominated and why. This study builds a forecasting model to shed light on these questions and implicitly offers a test of competing hypotheses through models that incorporate information derived from the various strands of theory in the presidential nomination literature.

Literature Review

The dominant perspective on the contemporary presidential nomination process holds that the primaries are the critical stage of the nomination (e.g., Aldrich 1980). The earliest models of presidential primary voting focused on patterns of candidate spending in each state (Goldstein 1978). Others focused on voter preferences for candidate characteristics and policies (e.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Who Wins Nominations and Why? an Updated Forecast of the Presidential Primary Vote
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.