Analyzing Public Issues - Clarification through Discussion: A Case Study of Social Studies Teachers

By Byford, Jeff; Russell, William | Social Studies Review, Fall 2006 | Go to article overview

Analyzing Public Issues - Clarification through Discussion: A Case Study of Social Studies Teachers


Byford, Jeff, Russell, William, Social Studies Review


Introduction

In 1957, two events helped set the stage for reform within the social studies curriculum. When the Soviet Union launched Sputnik, Americans feared Soviet technical superiority, causing a collective re-examination of school curriculum. The second event came from two researchers at Purdue University in the form of a public opinion poll of school age children. The results of the poll pushed for the dismal of the social studies in schools. Students believed the government should exercise the right to limit freedom of speech and have the power of search and seizure of individual's homes without search warrants. According to Barr, Barth and Shermis (1977), the Council for Basic Education and a substantial portion of Americans pushed for education reform.

Almost overnight the Office of Education launched a movement to make major changes in the nation's social studies curriculum by funding a variety of social studies projects which included: 1) the Carnegie-Mellon Social Studies Project, 2) the University of Minnesota Project Social Studies, 3) the Anthropology Curriculum Study Project, 4) Basic Concepts in History and Social Sciences, 5) the Committee on the Study of History, 6) the Developmental Economic Education Program, 7) Development of Economic Curricular Materials for Secondary Schools, 8) ECON 12, 9) the High School Geography Project, 10) Sociological Resources for secondary Schools, 11) the Harvard Social Studies Project, 12) Asian Studies Inquiry Project, 13) Project Africa, and 14) the North Central Association Foreign Relations Project (Dumas and Guenther, 1971). Eventual more than 50 projects were develop, to either integrate social studies for the purpose of citizenship education, or to teach history and social sciences as ends in themselves.

During the 1960s, new materials and projects were developed focusing on controversial issues, inquiry-based assessment, and student-led decision making. The Harvard Social Studies Project was one of the most popular curriculum projects to come out of the new social studies. Developed to teach high school students of average ability to clarify and justify their positions on public issues, the project used historical, fictional, and contemporary situations as illustrations of basic social and value conflicts. Analyzing Public Issues: Clarification through Discussion was one of many approaches used throughout the project.

According to Oliver and Newmann (1969) clarification through discussion can be divided into three basic elements: 1) the analysis of public controversy in terms of prescriptive, descriptive, and analytical issues, 2) the use of distinct strategies for justification and clarification, and 3) a systematic attention to the discussion process as one deals with controversial issues.

Research Study

Today, the discussion method is one of several teaching strategies used by social studies teachers as a means of learning. Unfortunately, many teachers often neglect this method of instruction due to the lack of control and comfort in students openly discussing and debating issues. Rather, teachers tend to use only one teaching style day after day, which denies the opportunity of a variety of teaching techniques (Siler, 1998).

The use of discussion, particularly clarification and analyzes through discussion can be used to teach students of average ability to clarify and justify their opinions on public issues, literature and historical events. Hess (2001) suggested that teaching with discussion and allowing student feedback means improving students' ability to think. Furthermore, teaching with discussion enables students to develop an understanding of the issues, enhance critical thinking skills, and improve student's interpersonal skills.

Harwood and Hahn (1990) allude that analyzing controversial topics is prevalent to the social studies for three reasons. First, analyzing controversial issues through discussion helps prepare students for future roles as citizens in a pluralistic society. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Analyzing Public Issues - Clarification through Discussion: A Case Study of Social Studies Teachers
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.