Insurance in the Courts (Formerly Recent Court Decisions)

By Maniloff, Randy; Mayerson, Marc et al. | Risk Management and Insurance Review, Fall 2006 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Insurance in the Courts (Formerly Recent Court Decisions)


Maniloff, Randy, Mayerson, Marc, Stempel, Jeffrey W., Risk Management and Insurance Review


MUCH-WATCHED CALIFORNIA CASE FINDS APPELLATE COURT OVERRULING POLICYHOLDER VICTORY AT TRIAL COURT LEVEL. ADOPTION OF SECTION 524(g) PRE-PACKAGED ASBESTOS BANKRUPTCY DOES NOT AUTOMATICALLY TRIGGER OR ACCELERATE COLLECTABILITY OF ASBESTOS-DEFENDANT POLICYHOLDER'S LIABILITY INSURANCE COVERAGE

Fuller-Austin v. Highlands Insurance Co. 135 Cal. App. 4th 958, 38 Cal. Rptr. 3d 716 (California Court of Appeal, 2d District, Jan. 19, 2006)

A California Court of Appeal panel (courts of appeal in California and elsewhere typically sit in panels of three judges) has reversed a ruling holding that liability insurers of an asbestos company had immediate obligations to perform in full once a trust was established through Section 524(g) of the bankruptcy code (11 U.S.C. §524(g)) that concurrently extinguished the liability of the policyholder vis-a-vis the asbestos claimant creditors. See Fuller-Austin v. Highlands Ins., 135 Cal. App. 4th 958, 38 Cal. Rptr. 3d 716 (Cal. App. Jan. 19,2006). (The California Court of Appeal is divided into districts for administrative purposes. The Second District encompasses Los Angeles, location of the trial of the Fuller-Austin case.) The "acceleration" of insurers' obligations that these §524(g) trusts might create has caused apoplexy (Marc's word; Jeff agrees; Randy thinks "great concern" is a more accurate description) in the insurance industry. The Fuller-Austin trial court had ruled that the creation of the trust meant the insurers had immediate obligations to perform for the total (nonbankruptcy) value of the future claim stream. When the Court of Appeals reversed, this no doubt produced a collective sigh of relief from the insurance industry (and their reinsurers).

There are two bankruptcy elements in these modern asbestos-driven bankruptcies that, when combined with prior rulings of courts dealing with bankruptcy effects on insurance, yielded an extraordinary result: obligations of insurers to pay the future asbestos obligations of the policyholder-debtor immediately and in full. Before turning to the Fuller-Austin decision itself, it is important to understand what debtors like Fuller-Austin were trying to achieve.

The first step in an asbestos-driven bankruptcy is to take the asbestos claims stream and estimate its value. The debtor then needs to satisfy this creditor claim in the bankruptcy. The debtor does this by setting up a trust and funding it with cash (from itself and sometimes its corporate parent), stock, and pre-existing insurance rights (under policies held by the debtor for years in which asbestos injury took place).

After establishing the trust, the debtor receives a channeling injunction that bars the assertion of any asbestos-related claim against itself (and sometimes against nondebtors (see Susan Powers Johnston and Katherine Porter, Extension of section 524(g) of the Bankruptcy Code to Nondebtor Parents, Affiliates, and Transaction Parties, 59 BUSINESS LAWYER 511-12 (2004)), and the injunction further funnels all claims to the trust. In other words, by paying "up front" to establish the trust, the debtor is able to emerge from bankruptcy shorn of its asbestos liabilities without fear of any future claims. The trust in turn is charged with resolving the asbestos claims and sets up an administrative compensation process, usually with relaxed standards of proof, to "adjudicate" the tort claims. The claimant may have the right further to bring an action in court, though punitive damages are typically barred.

This is the model that was used in the Johns-Manville bankruptcy. The model was confirmed, expanded, modified, and codified by Congress in 1994 when the bankruptcy code was amended with the addition of Section 524(g) (11 U.S.C. §524(g)), a provision specially designed to deal with asbestos-driven bankruptcies. While certain procedural and substantive changes were implemented in §524(g), from the debtor's perspective one key was that §524(g) made clear that future claims (claims by persons exposed to asbestos but who at the time of the bankruptcy filing had no legal claim) would have their claims channeled to the trust as well.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Insurance in the Courts (Formerly Recent Court Decisions)
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?