Trade Creation and Trade Diversion in the North American Free Trade Agreement: The Case of the Agricultural Sector

By Susanto, Dwi; Rosson, C. Parr, III et al. | Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, April 2007 | Go to article overview

Trade Creation and Trade Diversion in the North American Free Trade Agreement: The Case of the Agricultural Sector


Susanto, Dwi, Rosson, C. Parr, III, Adcock, Flynn J., Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics


This paper examines the effect of the U.S.-Mexico trade agreement under the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). The results suggest that U.S. agricultural imports from Mexico have been responsive to tariff rate reductions applied to Mexican products. A one percentage point decrease in tariff rates is associated with an increase in U.S. agricultural imports from Mexico by 5.31% in the first 6 years of NAFTA and by 2.62% in the last 6 years of NAFTA. U.S. imports from Mexico have also been attributable to the pre-NAFTA tariff rates. Overall, the results indicate that the U.S-Mexico trade agreement under NAFTA has been trade creating rather than trade diverting.

Key Words: agricultural sector, NAFTA, panel data, tariffs, trade creation, trade diversion

JEL Classifications: F10, F15, Q17, Q18, C31, C33

The surge of free trade agreements (FTAs) has raised the question of their effect on the countries included in the FTA and on the rest of the world (Bhagwati and Krueger; Krueger 1997). It is an issue that economists have long debated. The debate has divided economists between those who support FTAs and those who oppose them. The former group emphasizes trade-creating effects. By reducing (eliminating) trade barriers among members, FTA can improve resource allocation within a region and improve income for member countries. Production shifts toward the most efficient producers of specific commodities within the FTA and consumers are better off because they can purchase goods at lower prices. The latter group argues that FTAs are by definition discriminatory because they lower/eliminate barriers on internal trade while retaining barriers to trade with nonmembers and are, therefore, trade diverting. Even if an FTA results in internal trade creation, these proponents believe that such gains are likely to be outweighed by their trade-diverting effects. In general, one would expect an FTA to result in some amount of both trade creation and trade diversion (Krueger 1997; Venables). If the trade diversion is sufficiently large relative to the trade creation, the agreement could conceivably end up being harmful to the member countries.

The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) is one of the most comprehensive agreements in history. Like many other FTAs, the creation of NAFTA has been a subject of bitter discussions and division among politicians and economists, focusing on the effect that NAFTA might have on trade and economic welfare (Fukao, Okuba, and Stern). When NAFTA was being negotiated in the early 1990s, for example, many countries voiced concern that their exports to the United States (and, to a lesser extent, to Canada and Mexico) would be displaced by NAFTA exports, even though in many products and industries those countries could be more competitive than NAFTA producers (Lederman, Maloney, and Serven). From the viewpoint of Mexico, this trade diversion is also important because it would entail a loss of fiscal revenues from replacing imports from third countries subject to tariffs with duty-free imports from the United States or Canada.

Despite the growing concern of the debate, NAFTA was expected to create new trade among the member countries. Through progressive elimination of tariff and nontariff barriers, bilateral trade flows among the United States, Canada, and Mexico were expected to increase. A number of reports have shown evidence of increased trade flows. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO), for example, analyzed that by 2001, NAFTA had increased U.S. exports to Mexico by 11.3% and had increased U.S. imports from Mexico by 7.7% (CBO). On the other hand, the report also pointed out that the agreement had almost no effect on the U.S. trade balance with Mexico and little effect on the change in U.S. gross domestic product (GDP).

Considerable concern is also expressed about the welfare implications of increased trade among the NAFTA member countries. Agriculture is one of the sectors in which there is considerable concern about the potential effects of free trade agreements on domestic producers and consumers (Miljkovic and Paul). …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Trade Creation and Trade Diversion in the North American Free Trade Agreement: The Case of the Agricultural Sector
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.