The Stem Cell Divide: The Facts, the Fictions, and the Fear Driving the Greatest Scientific, Political, and Religious Debate of Our Time

By Jansen, Lynn A. | Care Management Journals, July 1, 2007 | Go to article overview

The Stem Cell Divide: The Facts, the Fictions, and the Fear Driving the Greatest Scientific, Political, and Religious Debate of Our Time


Jansen, Lynn A., Care Management Journals


THE STEM CELL DIVIDE: THE FACTS, THE FICTIONS, AND THE FEAR DRIVING THE GREATEST SCIENTIFIC, POLITICAL, AND RELIGIOUS DEBATE OF OUR TIME Micheal Bellomo New York: AMACOM Press, 2006, 254 pp., $24.95 (hardcover).

Over the past several years, public debate about the ethical and scientific merit of human stem cell research has become increasingly heated. The stakes of this debate were perhaps most clearly marked in August 2001 when President George W. Bush announced his administration's policy on extending federal funding to certain kinds of stem cell research. By allowing federal funding for research on existing lines of embryonic stem cells, the Bush administration effectively loosened earlier legislation that "prohibited the federal government from using taxpayer dollars to support any research in which human embryos are harmed or destroyed." 1

Not surprisingly, the administration's policy met with mixed reactions. Some commentators viewed the reluctance of the administration to extend funding to all embryonic stem cell research as an objectionable compromise to the religious right. On this view, the administration's policy would seriously limit important life-saving research in the service of controversial views about the moral status of the embryo. Other commentators, however, read the policy more charitably. They claimed that the administration's policy reflected "a perfectly appropriate exercise of governmental powers in a liberal democracy." 2 After all, the policy did not ban human embryonic stem cell research. It left open the possibility for scientists to seek other nonfederal sources of funding for their research.

Michael Bellomo's book, The Stem Cell Divide, does not spend too much time dwelling on the details of the now famous "Bush Compromise." Instead, he aims to provide readers with a broader look at the scientific, economic, and political aspects of stem cell research. His hope is that this approach will provide readers with enough background information to assess knowledgeably current and future policies affecting stem cell research.

There is much useful information in the book, and readers will profit from the balanced and detailed treatment of the background context of the stem cell debate. The book is divided into three main sections. Section I focuses on the historical scientific developments that led to the earliest research on cellular growth and regeneration. At the start of this section, Bellomo details how the work of Abraham Trembley in the 18th century laid the early foundation for the stem cell research that currently engages contemporary scientists. His brief discussion of the work of other scientists in this era reveals that stem cell research is not a brand new development-a product solely of 20th and 21st century science.

Nonscientists will appreciate the straightforward manner in which Bellomo describes the nature of stem cells. Indeed, this aspect of section 1 is perhaps the most important, since so much of the ethical and public controversy over stem cell research has to do with where the really valuable stem cells are to be found. Generally speaking, stem cells are cells that "have the ability to divide for indefinite periods in culture and to give rise to specialized cells" (Bellomo, p. 252). But stem cells can come from a variety of sources. As Bellomo explains, the drive to use embryonic stem cells is compelling because stem cells derived from this source retain the highest degree of pluripotency. These cells are still undifferentiated and therefore have the potential to develop into a wide variety of specialized cell types (p. 245). Embryonic stem cells, however, can only be obtained by removing the inner cell mass of the blastocyst, thereby destroying the embryo. Adult stem cells, by contrast, are not derived from embryos and are therefore not subject to the same moral controversy as embryonic stem cells. These cells can be found in various parts of the body such as the brain cells, bone marrow cells, and digestive cells. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

The Stem Cell Divide: The Facts, the Fictions, and the Fear Driving the Greatest Scientific, Political, and Religious Debate of Our Time
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.