Sticking to the Topic on SHARP-L and VICTORIA

By Leary, Patrick | Academe, January/February 2007 | Go to article overview

Sticking to the Topic on SHARP-L and VICTORIA

Leary, Patrick, Academe

Don't let your posters get off on tangents, warns a list owner.

I manage two scholarly discussion lists. SHARP-L, whose name comes from the Society for the History of Authorship, Reading, and Publishing, focuses on book history, and VICTORIA is devoted to the culture and society of nineteenth-century Britain. The early 1990s, when I began both lists, was an exciting time to explore the potential of the Internet for scholarly purposes. The Listserv software was comparatively primitive then, which meant that a list owner's chores could be absurdly laborintensive at times, but it was deeply satisfying to help build these vibrant scholarly communities.

One lesson I learned along the way is that the ecology of an active online community is surprisingly fragile. It can go wildly out of whack, and even self-destruct, in a very short time. I've seen any number of lists decline and die over the years. Some merely waste away through attrition and neglect until no one posts to them anymore; others become mere notice boards for calls for papers and the like, without any real interaction among subscribers. A few flame out spectacularly, bursting with so many nasty, off-topic messages that all the "lurkers" unsubscribe, leaving the disputants to fight among themselves until even they grow weary of it. Charting a middle course means achieving a high "signal-to-noise" ratio, in which the list's content is useful enough to make it worth people's time to stay involved.

Almost all members of both lists I manage have been thoughtful and courteous. Even so, I have put in a certain amount of time mediating disputes privately, trying to cool things down before they got out of hand. Each party to an argument wants to have the last word, of course, and on an email list, these tit-for-tat exchanges quickly get tedious. By now, we've almost grown accustomed to the sheer rhetorical violence of much disagreement on online bulletin boards and blogs, and something of the same can now and then find its way onto even the most mild-mannered scholarly list. It's a curious feature of the online world that people who would never descend to insults in a face-to-face argument, or even in a private exchange of e-mail, will sometimes get carried away in an online forum and commit the grossest incivilities if they're not checked. Fortunately, people now realize, in a way that many didn't ten years ago, how terribly destructive careless or ill-considered online behavior can be to their professional careers. This accumulation of experience with e-mail and Listservs has helped make the task of the list owner much easier than it used to be.

Ideally, subscribers will regard a scholarly list as a collegial discursive community rather than simply a distribution mechanism for professionally useful information. A few simple rules can help to achieve this goal. For content, the most important rule is topicality. As mundane as it sounds, keeping discussion within the list's stated topic area is the single most important job the list owner does; it's also the least well understood and generates the most conflict with individual subscribers. On VICTORIA, for example, our cardinal rule is that every message posted to the list must have some specific pertinence to the study of nineteenth-century Britain, counting that period as the "long" nineteenth century, from about 1780 to the end of the Great War, and, of course, including all parts of the empire.

One might think that those capacious bounds would leave plenty of room for discussion, and usually they do, but there's nevertheless a constant tendency for discussion threads to spin off into unrelated matters about which all academics everywhere are keen to express opinions. This centrifugal tendency isn't obvious to the individual subscriber, who doesn't see the harm in dashing off a tart opinion in a single e-mail, whether it's about politics, Google, the failings of students, tenure, or some event in the news. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)


1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

Cited article

Sticking to the Topic on SHARP-L and VICTORIA


Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.