Chapter 7: Material Analysis of Lithic Flaking Debris

By Saini-Eidukat, Bernhardt; Michlovic, Michael G. | Plains Anthropologist, November 2005 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Chapter 7: Material Analysis of Lithic Flaking Debris


Saini-Eidukat, Bernhardt, Michlovic, Michael G., Plains Anthropologist


Archaeologists throughout the northern Plains usually include raw material characterization in their analysis of stone artifacts. Morrow (1994) and Bakken (1997) have suggested procedures for the identification of lithic raw materials that involve the use of keys, comparative collections, and sorting of materials into lots based on color, luster, texture, and inclusions (such as fossils, oolites, and vugs). While Morrow does not apply his system to materials derived from till, Bakken's system is more or less explicitly directed at the examination of till-derived raw materials.

Lithic collections may be characterized using two different methods, here termed the macroscopic and microscopic. The macroscopic method is dependent on the use of comparative lithic collections, on comparison of lithic features visible to the unaided eye, or with the aid of a 1 Ox hand lens. The microscopic method is essentially pétrographie, involving the use of polarized light microscopes and the identification of mineralogical components in lithic thin sections. Over the past few decades various pétrographie and geochemical descriptions of northern Plains lithic materials have appeared in the literature. Some relevant examples are Porter (1962) for Tongue River silica and Bijou Hills quartzite, Loendorf et al. (1984) for Rainy Buttes silicified wood, Church (1994) for Ogalalla orthoquartzite (formerly Bijou Hills quartzite), Campling (1980) for Swan River chert, and Clayton et al. (1970) for Knife River flint. Others have described or discussed northern Plains lithics in more conventional archaeological terms. Examples are Ahler (1977), Anderson (1978), D. Fredlund (1976), and Low (1996). Bakken (1997) has assembled a review of lithics used in prehistoric Minnesota, and Morrow ( 1994) provides a key for identification of lithics commonly found in Iowa.

While archaeologists are becoming more sophisticated in description and analysis of lithic material, many archaeological studies are done without the benefit of petrographic analysis of thin sections, X-ray Diffraction (XRD), Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), or other laboratory techniques. The most useful of these techniques for archaeological identification of raw materials is petrographic description of thin sections. In many cases, optical microscopy using polarized light allows an investigator to identify the minerals that comprise a sample. Details of the textural relationships between mineral grains are clearly seen when they are magnified between 10-150Ox. The abundance of each mineral species present can be estimated, and in many cases, the composition and growth conditions of the rock can be interpreted. For extremely fine-grained rocks, optical microscopy does not provide the necessary magnification, and SEM analysis must be undertaken. A review of the applications of petrography to archaeology is provided by Kempe and Harvey (1983).

Given these two methods, questions sometime arise regarding the reliability of the macroscopic method. Specifically, are lithic raw material names assigned by archaeologists on the basis of macroscopic examination corroborated by thin section descriptions? For this reason a simple experiment was set up during the analysis of the Rustad lithic materials. The lithic collection was divided into raw material classes macroscopically, following a procedure similar to that described by Bakken (1997) and Morrow ( 1994). The procedure developed out of the recommendations of these researchers is to inspect lithic collections in aggregate, that is, to review large quantities of lithic material altogether, noting the range of variation across the collection. As this is done, the rough outlines of a lithic classification are developed. Next, a comparative collection of lithic material is used, along with basic descriptive information about the rock types that appear to be represented. Items from each provenience unit are then placed in one or another of the categories, paying special attention to color, color patterning (e.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Chapter 7: Material Analysis of Lithic Flaking Debris
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.