Social Skills of Adolescents in Special Education Who Display Symptoms of Oppositional Defiant Disorder

By Skoulos, Vasilios; Tryon, Georgiana Shick | American Secondary Education, Spring 2007 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Social Skills of Adolescents in Special Education Who Display Symptoms of Oppositional Defiant Disorder


Skoulos, Vasilios, Tryon, Georgiana Shick, American Secondary Education


ABSTRACT

Twenty-seven special education students in self-contained classes whose behavior met DSM-IV (American Psychiatric Association, 1994) diagnosti1c criteria for an ODD diagnosis were matched according to age, gender, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, math and reading scores, and IQ with 27 special education students in self-contained classes who did not meet ODD diagnostic criteria. Teachers rated students who met DSM-IV criteria for ODD as having fewer social skills, lower academic competence, and more problem behaviors than special education students whose behavior did not meet criteria for an ODD diagnosis. Results suggest that students with ODD symptoms would benefit from social skills instruction.

INTRODUCTION

Education of students with disabilities has progressed from exclusion of some children with handicaps to instruction in special education classes to legislation stipulating the placement of these children in classes with regular education students without handicapping conditions (Jacob & Hartshorne, 2003). The movement toward increased mainstreaming of special education students has elicited some cautionary reaction. Gresham (1984) protested the arbitrary placement of special education students with their non-disabled peers. He argued that the concept of mainstreaming was based in part upon three assumptions. The first assumption was that physical placement of children needing special education in general education classrooms would result in increased social interaction between general and special education children. The second assumption was that mainstream placement would result in social acceptance of children with disabilities by their non-disabled peers. The third assumption was that mainstreamed children with disabilities would model or imitate the behavior of their non-disabled peers. Gresham (1984) presented evidence from several studies that these assumptions were faulty, and he recommended social skills training prior to mainstreaming special education students because they were found to have social skills deficits compared to general education students.

Meadows, Neel, Scott, and Parker, (1994) concluded that including disabled students with their non-disabled peers poses problems particularly for students whose disabling condition is classified as an emotional disturbance. Research by Gable, Hendrickson, and Rutherford (1991) found that social skills among students with emotional disturbances are not as well developed as those of students with other handicapping conditions such as learning disabilities. These social skills deficiencies may present problems in mainstreaming emotionally disturbed students (Gresham, 1984). Social skill deficits for emotionally disturbed students may be the most critical deterrent to social acceptance (Schloss, Schloss, Wood, & Kiehl, 1986). Studies indicate that many students with behavioral disorders lack appropriate social skills (Gresham, 1984, 1986) and are poorly accepted by their peers (Sabornie, 1985). Others (Gersten, Walker, & Darch, 1988; Treder, Morse, & Perron, 2000) have found reluctance by teachers to include these students in their classrooms.

Based on such findings, Meadows, Neel, Parker, andTimo (1991) recommended that, prior to placing behaviorally-disordered students in regular education classes, educators need to look closely at students' specific social skills deficits and levels of social competence. If students who have particular types of emotional disorders demonstrate social skills deficits, these deficits should be addressed with social skills training before including these students in classes with non-disabled students. Otherwise, mainstreaming efforts with these students may not succeed.

The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-Fourth Edition (DICA-R) is a widely used categorization system of emotional disturbances that may be used to distinguish various groups of students with disabilities (American Psychiatric Association, 1994).

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Social Skills of Adolescents in Special Education Who Display Symptoms of Oppositional Defiant Disorder
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?