Estate of Wall V. Commissioner: An Answer to the Problem of Settlor Standing in Trust Law?

By Houston, Michael R. | Northwestern University Law Review, Summer 2005 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Estate of Wall V. Commissioner: An Answer to the Problem of Settlor Standing in Trust Law?


Houston, Michael R., Northwestern University Law Review


I. INTRODUCTION

A settlor's ability to enforce the terms of a private irrevocable trust remains an open question, both in the courts and in the larger legal community, despite many commentators' encouragement to resolve the issue.1 The issue is important to living settlors who want to both subject their donations of wealth to restrictions or conditions, and simultaneously minimize their overall tax liability.2 Trust restrictions imposed by settlors may include provisions for asset management by a skilled trustee,3 controlled asset disbursement to beneficiaries based on the trustee's discretion or the beneficiaries' needs,4 or other criteria specified by the settlor.5 In many cases, the settlor also wants to retain some degree of control over the trust, even if only in a supervisory role, in order to ensure that the trust functions as envisioned.6 Even more ideal for the settlor would be the ability to impose his or her ongoing wishes over trust operation as circumstances change and evolve.7

Although a settlor is ostensibly free to incorporate such wishes into the trust terms, adverse tax consequences may result where a settlor retains control over the disposition of trust assets up until the time of his death.8 This reflects a "favored" tax status for outright inter vivos gifts (i.e., gifts given while the donor is living) as opposed to testamentary transfers that are not completed until death.9 The settlor's desire to minimize taxes is therefore in tension with the desire to reserve control over the disposition of trust assets beyond the date of trust inception.10

Settlors often attempt to balance these concerns by creating an irrevocable trust." In a typical irrevocable trust, settlors specify the terms and conditions governing the operation of the trust prior to the trust's creation.12 A trustee is then empowered to fulfill the trust provisions.13 The settlor often confers a great deal of discretion on the trustee, especially in modernday trusts,14 in order to deal with unanticipated events or changed conditions regarding asset investments or the beneficiaries' financial situations, for example. Assuming the trustee adheres to the trust terms and faithfully fulfills his duties, the settlor's wishes are generally carried out. Relinquishing control over the trust property to the trustee in this manner will usually satisfy the tax code provisions requiring the surrender of control by the settlor.15 Albeit imperfect, inter vivos irrevocable trusts are often the best solution for settlors wishing to make a conditional transfer of wealth while minimizing their tax burden.16

One problem that can arise in irrevocable trusts, however, is that the trustee's actions may not always conform to the settlor's wishes. This problem is exacerbated where the trustee has been granted a great deal of discretion, or new circumstances or information arise after the trust terms are finalized.17 Such infidelity may be the result of unclear trust terms, differences of opinion, or outright trustee misconduct, including collusion between the trustee and beneficiaries to thwart the trust provisions. In such cases, settlors naturally want the ability to enforce the terms of a trust, especially when preventing trustee or beneficiary misconduct.18 Unfortunately for these settlors, the weight of authority rejects the ability of an otherwise disinterested settlor to enforce the trust terms or to ensure that the trustee adheres to his other fiduciary duties.19 This result stems from the historical perception of trusts as a conveyance of property, which viewed the settlor's role as complete once the property was conveyed in trust.20

Some have suggested that a possible remedy for settlors is to contract directly with the trustee.21 With such a contract, a breach by the trustee could be remedied by the settlor in a suit not for a breach of trust, but for a breach of contract. The primary difficulty with this approach is that it is unknown whether such a contract will cause the trust assets to be included in the settlor's gross estate upon death.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Estate of Wall V. Commissioner: An Answer to the Problem of Settlor Standing in Trust Law?
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?