Does the Use of Inter-Group Competition Enhance Performance in Short-Term Summative Testing?

By Roncarati, Marco; Brassey, Alex et al. | Teaching Business & Economics, Summer 2006 | Go to article overview

Does the Use of Inter-Group Competition Enhance Performance in Short-Term Summative Testing?


Roncarati, Marco, Brassey, Alex, Bridges, Paul, Creaby, Caroline, et al., Teaching Business & Economics


Research has been undertaken in business studies and economics departments of schools in North London to investigate whether inter-group competition, as opposed to collaboration, enhances or detracts from assessment performance. The tentative conclusion reached is that inter-group competition, relative to collaboration, improves assessment performance and related learning. This paper represents our collective findings and conclusions.

Our intention was to investigate whether inter-group competition, compared to collaborative or co-operative inter-group work, enhances or detracts from written assessment performance in business and economics education (BEE). We focused on the objective output, namely actual test results on AVCE/Applied, GCSE and A level courses. Our hypothesis was that using inter-group competition enhances performance in short-term summative testing.

The research was undertaken within business studies and economics departments of various mixed, girls-only and boys-only schools, including comprehensives, sixth form colleges and independent schools. We met regularly to discuss research strategy and implementation, and contributed to each other's work. We all undertook primary research in two schools, staying three months in each school.

PREVIOUS RESEARCH

There is little in the educational research literature on the effects of inter-group competition in this subject area. However, there is an abundance of literature, supported by psychological, educational and motivational research, addressing the value of collaborative group work compared to individually competitive work, which, though fun, purportedly diminishes performance.

We argue that results from collaborative learning may be impressive in their own right, and compared to individual learning, but are not necessarily more impressive than the product of inter-group competition. Our investigation compares the products of intragroup and inter-group collaboration (group members and groups completing tasks together) with intra-group collaboration and intergroup competition (group members working together but competing against other groups).

METHODOLOGY

In each school, we ran at least one experimental pair of lessons (involving competitive and collaborative techniques) with a class of students. The students took a written test - designed for the last 10 minutes of each lesson - with five multiple-choice questions and five corresponding one or two sentence answer questions. The tests from each pair of lessons form the basis of comparison in our analysis, with 17 sets of data involving 224 students from nine different schools. Altogether 96 females and 128 males were involved. There were 133 A level students, 9 AVCE students and 82 GCSE students.

Numerous variables impinge on the success of group work. We attempted to hold these variables constant as far as possible by using the pair of lessons with the same classes.

We ensured that competition was as explicit as possible. The goal of winning in inter-group competition is less hostile than in individually competitive scenarios. However, students understood that they were competing as a group, their relative success was shown to them, and the winning group got a prize. All competitive lessons were established with this dynamic and run on similar lines.

Competitive activities involved quizzes and competitive presentations, where groups were judged and winners given prizes. Examples of collaborative activities included groups working toward and delivering a presentation to peers and role plays to demonstrate a particular scenario. The research group made use of Paul Ginnis' book The Teachers Toolkit (Crown House Publishing), as it is a useful source of ideas, especially for group work.

Our lack of exact replication in classroom activities could be considered a design weakness. Practical considerations aside, we believe that a "one size fits all approach" to the lessons would have been restrictive and possibly counter-productive. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Does the Use of Inter-Group Competition Enhance Performance in Short-Term Summative Testing?
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.