Patients V. Patents? Policy Implications of Recent Patent Legislation

By Katopis, Chris J | St. John's Law Review, Spring 1997 | Go to article overview

Patients V. Patents? Policy Implications of Recent Patent Legislation


Katopis, Chris J, St. John's Law Review


INTRODUCTION

Ancient Greek philosophers, such as those depicted in Aristotle's The Politics, advocated recognition, awards, and honors for the achievements of discoverers.1 At the same time, the Hippocratic Oath commands physicians to care for their patients ethically and selflessly.2 These Hellenic ideas flourished and were widely embraced by civilizations around the globe and throughout the ages.3 Yet recently, the western legal system has witnessed a collision between these ancient principles.

Patents for industrial and consumer innovation are common and are welcomed in our society.4 Yet the widespread pursuit of patents for medical innovations has aroused strong opinions and has elicited powerful emotional reactions from the public, as if a reminder of one's own mortality.5 Whether a society should recognize, or, further, even protect a medical discovery implicates a host of questions from the fields of science, law, economics, and ethics.6 This issue also implicates the proper roles of the federal government, the states, and the medical and legal professions in fostering the progress of science, medicine, and the public health.7

The United States Congress is vested with broad authority to enact statutes and to shape public policy. The historic 104th Congress tackled a long legislative agenda, including passing significant legislation to ensure patient access to health care, as part of the ongoing debate over a national health care policy.8 Numerous intellectual property bills were also introduced to address the interests of patent, copyright, and trademark holders.

Legal worlds collided when a conflict arose between health care and patent law. Litigation over patents for medical procedures became a subject of political debate. In response, a restriction on medical procedure patent infringement remedies was introduced in the Congress and signed into law by the President. The outcome of this legislative activity reveals much about the perceptions of the medical and patent law professions, as well as the fundamental underpinnings of the United States patent system.

This Article explores whether the patent code can be changed in a way that enhances innovation and economic activity, especially in the biomedical arena. Consideration is given to aspects of the legal, economic, scientific, and ethical dimensions of the intersection of medicine and patent law. In light of recent litigation and legislation, this Article reviews the background and history of medical patents and discusses alternatives to the newly enacted change in the patent code. The next section of this Article advocates prior user rights as a narrowly tailored alternative course to solve some of the patent system's current flaws, both with biotechnology and generally. Finally, this Article examines these policies in the context of economic theory and legal principles.

I. MEDICAL PATENT LEGISLATION

"The reason for the patent system is to encourage innovation and its fruits: new jobs and new industries, new consumer goods and trade benefits."9

Recent medical patent litigation spurred a legislative chain reaction. In Pallin v. Singer,10 eye surgeon Dr. Samuel Pallin sued several of his peers, including fellow eye surgeon, Dr. Jack Singer, for the infringement of a medical procedure patent covering a new cataract surgery technique.11 Neither civil suits against doctors nor patent infringement litigation are uncommon on their own merits,12 yet this suit is considered remarkable. It is a rare instance of one physician suing another over an invention such as a medical procedure patent.13

The invention at stake is patent number 5,080,111, a technique for making a chevron shaped incision into the white wall of the eye14 in such a fashion to be "substantially self sealing" and sutureless.15 The Pallin patent reportedly results in a "savings of $17 per operation."16 Despite these savings, the defendants objected to paying either the patent royalty fee of $5 per operation17 or a flat fee for a clinic of $2,500 to $10,000 per year. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Patients V. Patents? Policy Implications of Recent Patent Legislation
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.