The Effect of a Flashing Visual Stimulus on the Auditory Continuity Illusion

By Kobayashi, Maori; Osada, Yoshihisa et al. | Perception and Psychophysics, April 2007 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

The Effect of a Flashing Visual Stimulus on the Auditory Continuity Illusion


Kobayashi, Maori, Osada, Yoshihisa, Kashino, Makio, Perception and Psychophysics


The effect of a visual stimulus on the auditory continuity illusion was examined. Observers judged whether a tone that was repeatedly alternated with a band-pass noise was continuous or discontinuous. In most observers, a transient visual stimulus that was synchronized with the onset of the noise increased the limit of illusory continuity in terms of maximum noise duration and maximum tone level. The smaller the asynchrony between the noise onset and the visual stimulus onset, the larger the visual effect on this illusion. On the other hand, detection of a tone added to the noise was not enhanced by the visual stimulus. These results cannot be fully explained by the conventional theory that illusory continuity is created by the decomposition of peripheral excitation produced by the occluding sound.

The auditory continuity illusion is a compelling perceptual effect in which a sound (the inducee) interrupted momentarily by an extraneous sound (the inducer) is perceived as continuing through the inducer, even if the inducee is, in fact, physically absent during the presentation of the inducer (Houtgast, 1972; Miller & Licklider, 1950; Warren, Obusek, & Ackroff, 1972; see Warren, 1999, for a review). This phenomenon not only is a powerful illusion, but also represents an important ecological function of the auditory system that compensates for the effect of the masking by extraneous sounds often encountered in everyday situations. However, the mechanism underlying the auditory continuity illusion is not fully understood.

Some clues have been obtained concerning the processing stage at which the illusion is created. It has been shown that the continuity illusion involves frequency-selective processes. It occurs only when there is no decrease in excitation at the frequencies of the inducee during the presence of the inducer (Darwin, 2005; Houtgast, 1972; Warren et al., 1972). This masking potential rule indicates that peripheral filtering in the auditory system is involved in the process of creating the illusory continuity.

It has also been shown that the continuity illusion involves processes sensitive to binaural disparity. Kashino and Warren (1996) demonstrated that the illusion is inhibited when the interaural phase difference of the inducer and that of inducee are different and, as a consequence, the masking potential of the inducer is reduced due to the binaural masking level difference. This suggests that illusory continuity is produced after binaural convergence at the level of the brainstem nuclei. Darwin, Akeroyd, and Hukin (2002) also demonstrated the binaural contribution to the continuity illusion, using Huggins pitch.

There is also evidence that the continuity illusion involves processes that operate after the information from different frequency channels is integrated. Darwin (2005) examined the effect of simultaneous grouping of frequency components on the continuity illusion and demonstrated that judgments of auditory continuity are based on entire, simultaneously grouped objects, rather than solely determined by local criteria based on individual frequency channels.

Several studies have indicated that the process responsible for the auditory continuity illusion should operate before the perceptual attributes (e.g., loudness, pitch, etc.) of an auditory object are computed. For example, the apparent loudness of the inducer is reduced when continuity is perceived (McAdams, Botte, & Drake, 1998; Warren, Bashford, Healy, & Brubaker, 1994). Furthermore, continuity improves fundamental frequency (pitch) discrimination for unresolved complex tones (Plack & White, 2000).

Some studies in which a forced choice task has been employed have shown that the continuity illusion can impair performance (Petkov, O'Connor, & Suiter, 2003). This suggests that the continuity illusion is an automatic and compulsory process, free from the voluntary control of listeners.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

The Effect of a Flashing Visual Stimulus on the Auditory Continuity Illusion
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?