Impassioned Teaching

By Caughie, Pamela L. | Academe, July/August 2007 | Go to article overview

Impassioned Teaching


Caughie, Pamela L., Academe


DON'T BE AFRAID OF CLASSROOM ADVOCAY; IT'S NOT THE SAME THING AS INDOCTRINATION.

In a recent episode of Law and Order. "Good Faith" (number 17017), a group of parents insisted that a biology teacher in a Christian school be fired for teaching evolution, or at least be forced to teach intelligent design as well. When the principal refused to support them, the teacher ended up dead. In defense of the father who admitted Io the killing (though, it turns out, for other reasons), the defense attorney argued that the teaching of evolution presented a real and Imminent threat to his daughter's life and salvation; by causing her to doubt her religious beliefs, the teacher was ensuring that she would burn in hell. The prosecuting attorney is incredulous and dismisses the defense's argument as having no legal standing, hut his associate realizes that this ilismis sive response might backfire, reinforcing the public's belief that liberal lawyers are intolerant of religious beliefs. And indeed, the tabloid headlines the next day read "Prosecutor v. Cod."

This episode made me think of our current debate over academic freedom, often presented as a conflict between liberal and conservative beliefs. In the September-October 2006 issue of . hádeme. Kurt Smith writes:

The strategy (of those defending intelligent design involves making it look as if the scientific convictions of biologists are political in nature. And politically, of course, folks have a right Io believe what they want. ... I lorowitz comes to the rescue by offering the [Academic hill of Rights, which]. . . . argues that because no one's political viewpoint should be kept out of the classroom, laws need to be in place to keep biologists from ruling out intelligent design.

Yet the Lau- and Order episode also shows that the impassioned teaching of evolution (indeed, of any subject) can, and often does, shape values. Once one comes to see the world differently through the study of a particular subject matter or the acceptance of a particular theory, one becomes a different kind of person, and a different kind of citizen - precisely the point, one would think, of higher education. That is, it is not so much what is said in the classroom that's at issue, hut the feared consequences of the liassions and commitments that our teaching may inspire.

False Opposition

The ongoing debate over academic freedom in venues such iisAcademe, the Chronicle of 'Higher Education, andtheA'c/r York Times frames the issue in terms of a clash between values and politics on the one hand, and scholarship on the other. According to the Chronicle of Higher Education. David Horowitz 's "Academic Kill of Rights" was developed in response to the belief that the academy is dominated hv leftists and biased against conservative scholars and students. The intent of the hill is "to remove partisan politics from the classroom'' ("In Defense of Intellectual Diversity," February 13, 2004). On this point, it would seem Horowitz is in agreement with his critics. Literary and legal scholar Stanley Fish, for example, has argued in the New York 'Times ("Advocacy and Teaching," March 24, 2007) that one should separate one's scholarly self from one's partisan self when teaching. Yet as literature professor Michael Bérubé pointed out in his plenary address to the MUP's annual meeting, published Academe's November-December 2006 issue, the logic of Horowitz's position brings accusations of liberal bias together with a defense of freedom of speech, so that academic freedom now means freedom from liberal professors and liberal convictions, as if what professors taught were merely viewpoints, not knowledge. "Just as it is a mistake to think that there are two sides to every question," Beruhe says, "it is also a mistake - and a pernicious one, encouraged by I lorowitz . . . and company - to think that there are only two sides to every question."

I agree. But I also worry that that's precisely the position we fall into in defending the l')4() Statement of Principles on .

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Impassioned Teaching
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.