Between Pews & Polls

By Antle, W. James, III | The American Conservative, July 3, 2007 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Between Pews & Polls


Antle, W. James, III, The American Conservative


Have values voters lost their clout?

HAS THE RELIGIOUS Right become irrelevant? Such a question would have been unthinkable only three years ago. According to political analysts across the ideological spectrum, the first big lesson of the 2004 election was that the parties were now aligned around values rather than economics. The second was that socially conservative "values voters" outnumbered their secular liberal counterparts, to the net benefit of Republican candidates. White evangelical Christians make up the GOP's largest single voting bloc.

You wouldn't be able to tell this by looking at the Republican presidential field. No candidate with a history of identifying with this bloc polls better than low single digits nationally. Ross Douthat of The Atlantic Monthly, observing that Iowa is somewhere "a semi-obscure social conservative ought to be able to make some noise," pointed to a Mason-Dixon poll showing "Smike Brownbuckabee" - a composite of Sam Brownback and former Mike Huckabee-at 13 percent. But in the 2000 caucuses, Alan Keyes won 14 percent by himself.

Instead the field is led by Rudolph Giuliani, a twice-divorced supporter of legal abortion and same-sex civil unions. Mitt Romney, the top-tier candidate who has worked hardest at courting religious conservatives, was pro-choice until 2005. Fred Thompson is also expected to make a play for these voters, but detractors are already digging into what they say is his own pro-choice past.

Among the leading contenders, John McCain has been allied with social conservatives the longest. But he has never seemed especially comfortable with them, famously blasting two Religious Right leaders as "agents of intolerance" during his 2000 campaign meltdown. They are equally offhand with him. And McCain's record has its blemishes, with votes for taxpayer funded embryonic stem-cell research and against the federal marriage amendment.

How did religious conservatives end up without a logical candidate? It isn't because their influence is on the wane otherwise. Even if organizations like the Christian Coalition have atrophied, white evangelicals cast the highest percentage of votes for Republican congressional candidates-72 percent - in 2006. Pollster Tony Fabrizio's vast survey of Republicans shows moralists, a different but overlapping category of conservative voters, making up the same share of the GOP today as in 1997 (24 percent, the largest group), while the ranks of economic conservatives have shrunk by nearly two-thirds.

If social conservatives coalesced around a single candidate, their choice would stand an excellent chance of being the nominee. But it isn't that simple. Religious conservative voters are much more diverse than their media image would suggest, and Christian Right leaders are far more pragmatic-and more solicitous of the GOP's electoral interests. The movement doesn't always support its own. According to one poll, only 6 percent of evangelicals support Huckabee, a Southern Baptist minister.

This is nothing new. Pat Robertson was the first Republican presidential candidate to come directly from the Religious Right He did well in several states, coming in second in the Iowa caucuses, and collected over 2 million votes before dropping out But Robertson did so without the endorsement of Jerry Falwell and many other prominent Christian Right leaders, who were on board with the frontrunner, George HW. Bush.

In his obituary for Falwell, conservative activist Howard Phillips recounted that the Moral Majority founder had decided to back Bush as early as 1981. "I protested, saying that Bush stood for a great many things with which both Jerry and I profoundly disagreed," Phillips recalled. "Jerry replied that, by backing Vice President Bush early on, he would gain his confidence and have greater influence over his policies."

After 1988, this was Robertson's approach as well. He tacitly supported Bob Dole over the more socially conservative Pat Buchanan in 1996 and backed George W.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Between Pews & Polls
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?