Right to Work and the Colorado Labor Peace Act: How Politics Trumped Policy

By Hogler, Raymond L. | Labor Law Journal, Summer 2007 | Go to article overview

Right to Work and the Colorado Labor Peace Act: How Politics Trumped Policy


Hogler, Raymond L., Labor Law Journal


In early 2007, the Colorado legislature passed a bill to modify Colorado's Labor Peace Act (the CLPA).1 This statute contains a feature found nowhere else in American labor law. It requires that if a union wins certification under the federal National Labor Relations Act, the union must also prevail in a state secret ballot election before it can legally propose a union security clause in the collective bargaining agreement. The voting requirement is unusual in that it requires at least a three-quarters majority of eligible voters in the bargaining unit. The proposed modification, HB 1072, would have eliminated the second election and moved Colorado to the status of a union security state rather than a "modified" right to work state.

Business groups in the state mobilized an intense political campaign against the bill. After passage in the Colorado House, the legislation moved to the Senate where management representatives testified at length against the bill. They put forward two major arguments against HB1072. The first argument focused on the rights of individuals to be protected from union domination, and the second asserted that Colorado's economic environment would suffer severe consequences as a result of the change. Those arguments failed to persuade Senate legislators, who voted in favor of the bill.

Business lobbyists then turned their attention to the newly-elected Democratic Governor, Bill Ritter. Most analysts assumed that Ritter would sign the law because he had received strong support from organized labor during his campaign and had indicated that the change would be acceptable.2 Surprisingly, however, Ritter exercised his veto power to kill the legislation. While he agreed with the substance of HR 1072, Ritter said in his veto message that the process by which the bill had been moved through the General Assembly was too politicized and excluded affected groups from full participation in debate and discussion.3

This article examines the event from the perspective of right to work laws generally and as an exemplary case study of ideology and symbolism as they impact American workers. Right to work laws frustrate, rather than protect, the interests of workers in their collective well-being, and there is no credible evidence to support the claim that union security negatively affects a state's economic development. What the Colorado experience demonstrates, with remarkable clarity, is that rhetoric, power, and partisanship continue to dominate labor policy in this country. That fact has profound implications for the organized labor movement. It suggests that any attempt to create a more favorable legal climate for organizing will encounter massive resistance from a cohesive political bloc possessing vast resources and a singular focus. Despite political support for pro-labor laws, such as the current Employee Free Choice Act, those laws will not be enacted.

BACKGROUND OF THE CLPA

The National Labor Relations (Wagner) Act of 1935 revolutionized the American law of industrial relations. It repudiated a century of common law and constitutional doctrine that articulated the primacy of "freedom of contract" over the collective or legislative rights of labor.4 Because the Supreme Court had regularly eviscerated any state or federal legislation enacted before the Wagner Act, employers believed that the statute was an unconstitutional exertion of federal power and ignored its mandate in favor of collective bargaining. Workers, regardless, engaged in a historic undertaking to unionize their workplaces, and with the formation of the Congress of Industrial Organizations in 1936, labor rapidly organized the major industrial sectors of the economy.5 The U.S. Supreme Court, in the 1937 landmark decision in Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. v. NLRB,6 upheld the constitutionality of the Wagner Act, and the modern labor movement was established.

Reaction to these developments from business groups was swift and virulent.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Right to Work and the Colorado Labor Peace Act: How Politics Trumped Policy
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.