UPPER CHAMBER NEEDS CHANGING, BUT- Proposed "Triple-E" Senate Falls Short of Needed Reform

By Bobier, Paul | CCPA Monitor, September 2007 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

UPPER CHAMBER NEEDS CHANGING, BUT- Proposed "Triple-E" Senate Falls Short of Needed Reform

Bobier, Paul, CCPA Monitor

Ask most people what Canada's Senate is for, and you'll hear it's a place where retired politicians and other well-known persons go to relax, and occasionally approve bills passed in the House of Commons. Few really appreciate why the Upper House of Canadian politics was created as part of the structure of Confederation. So they are inclined to shrug off Prime Minister Harper's plan to transform the Upper House into an elected, equal, and effective (triple-E) Senate.

There were three main reasons for creating the Senate: to represent the regions of Canada, to provide "sober second thought" to House of Commons legislation, and to represent the propertied folk of the nation. As Ken McNaught noted in The Penguin History of Canada, however, the original reasons for its creation gave way to political patronage.

"In practice," McNaught wrote, "the Senate developed more as a convenient means of rewarding faithful party supporters whom it would be inconvenient or indiscreet to appoint to the bench (judiciary) or the cabinet. The result has been that the Canadian Senate has been even less successful than the (British) House of Lords in opposing the full development of democratic politics centred in the Commons."

At present, the Senate is dominated by Liberal Party appointees. Harper's government hasn't been in power long enough to replace many retiring Liberal senators with Tory appointees, but, even though most of his government's bills have been passed by the Liberal-dominated Senate, Harper still wants to convert it into a chamber that is elected by the people, equal in representation from each province, and effective in protecting regional interests.

In effect, the prime minister wants a Senate similar to the one in the United States, where it is one of the two houses of Congress-and also triple-E.

Some may think the U.S. Senate provides a better check-and-balance to a president's power than the Canadian Senate does to a prime minister's power. Well, sometimes it does, and sometimes it doesn't. Veteran U.S. Senator Robert Byrd points out that the American Senate can be denied important information by the president, and also subject to compliant attitudes on presidential policy.

On the Congressional vote permitting the Iraq invasion of 2003, for example, Senator Byrd wrote: "Presidents and their staffs begin to feel they are untouchable-that they can get away with skating over certain lines because they control information, both public and classified. It may be hard for most Americans to believe, but most members of Congress find it difficult to obtain classified information, even when they request it as part of their committee duties."

In his book The Age of Anxiety, journalist Haynes Johnson claimed that: "Congress too often has failed to protect the people. Members of both political parties gave the president a virtually free hand in implementing new security measures, and turned a blind eye to legitimate concerns about the danger of civil rights abuses arising out of these laws and regulations.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

UPPER CHAMBER NEEDS CHANGING, BUT- Proposed "Triple-E" Senate Falls Short of Needed Reform


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?