A Perfectly Staged 'Concerted Action' against Psychoanalysis: The 1913 Congress of German Psychiatrists

By Falzeder, Ernst M.; Burnham, John C. | International Journal of Psychoanalysis, October 2007 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

A Perfectly Staged 'Concerted Action' against Psychoanalysis: The 1913 Congress of German Psychiatrists

Falzeder, Ernst M., Burnham, John C., International Journal of Psychoanalysis

An eyewitness account provides evidence of a significant clandestine effort to neutralize the legitimacy and authority of psychoanalysis. In a letter, the witness confirms the existence of a perfectly staged concerted action among German psychiatrists against Freud's influence in 1913. Their congress in Breslau was meant to present the united front of German psychiatrists, who were going on record as being against psychoanalysis and, in that context, to give Eugen Bleuler, a leading psychiatrist, whose (however half-hearted) support for psychoanalysis had alarmed his colleagues, a public opportunity for back-pedalling. The letter shows that Freud and his allies were not the only ones who tried to manage an intellectual movement by using informal networks and 'behind the scenes' manoeuvring.

Keywords: psychiatry in Germany, history of psychoanalysis, intellectual history, Freud, Eugen Bleuler, Alfred Hoche

Did Freud's views gain a fair hearing in the scientific community of his time? Freud himself certainly did not believe so. According to him, his early communications were met with 'silence'. His 'writings were not reviewed ... or ... were dismissed with expressions of scornful or pitying superiority' (Freud, 1914, pp. 21-3). 'Word was given out to abandon me, for a void is forming around me' (Freud, 1985, p. 185).2 In a letter of 1904, Freud cited the 'expressions of malicious superiority' on the part of 'his Viennese colleagues' as the reason that he did not publish any substantial works at that time (Gundlach, 1977, p. 912).3 There is also that famous instance at the Nuremberg Congress in 1910, where, according to an eyewitness, he said that he was 'perpetually attacked' and, seizing his coat by the lapels, 'They won't even leave me a coat to my back' (Wittels, 1924, p. 140).4 There is no doubt that he identified a group of 'enemies of analysis' (Freud, 1914, p. 49).

Freud's self-portrayal as a lone fighter for truth, who met with the fiercest resistance, was taken over, or even further embellished, by many of his followers and biographers (most notably Jones, 1953, 1955, 1957). More recent studies challenged that image. Sulloway tried to refute the 'complex myth that both Freud and his followers have sought to propagate-a mythology that pictures Freud as the lonely "psychoanalytic hero" who, all by himself and against a universally hostile outside world, "invented" a totally original psychology' (1979, cover). Decker (1977), following up on work by Bry and Rifkin (1962), found that, at least until 1907, Freud's publications and ideas gained a respectful hearing in major publications. According to Decker, large numbers of people in the German-speaking world were aware that Freud had introduced some innovative ideas, and there was a broad spectrum of reactions. There were indeed strong criticisms, but they were made perfectly openly. In sum, in Decker's view psychoanalysis had a fair hearing in Germany before World War I and was often alluded to, even if unfavourably, in, for example, textbooks: 'Freud was by no means totally ignored or rejected' (Decker, 1977, p. 1, our italics).

Was the hostility against Freud himself and against psychoanalysis, then, never as fierce, unfair or unrelenting as he claimed? Was there no 'organized' opposition at all? Was there never 'word given out'? And did, thus, Freud have a 'paranoid streak' (Crews, 1995, p. 108) and imagine conspiracies? Esterson (2002, pp. 123-4), for instance, speculates that Freud's sense that he was isolated by his colleagues was 'the reflection of a mild tendency toward paranoia', possibly growing out of his use of cocaine.

In this paper, we take a closer look at one seminal event, a session at the annual meeting of German psychiatrists, specifically dedicated to a discussion of psychoanalysis. This event seems specially suited to serve as an example. This was the official congress of the German Society of Psychiatry. It was the first occasion that such an august and influential body had chosen psychoanalysis as a topic.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

A Perfectly Staged 'Concerted Action' against Psychoanalysis: The 1913 Congress of German Psychiatrists


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?