Greed or Social Injustice? Competing Approaches to Conflict Resolution and Sustainable Peace in Colombia

By Rudqvist, Anders | Ibero-americana, July 1, 2006 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Greed or Social Injustice? Competing Approaches to Conflict Resolution and Sustainable Peace in Colombia

Rudqvist, Anders, Ibero-americana


This article discusses the relationship between poverty and inequality on the one hand and insurgency and armed conflict on the other, against the recent historical background, the current political developments towards a negotiated settlement, and the prevailing internal armed conflict in Colombia. Particular attention will be given to the ongoing peace talks between the Colombian government and the ELN (Ejército de Liberación National) guerrilla movement since these conversations and earlier peace negotiation efforts, as well as earlier negotiations with PARC (Fuerzas Armadas Revolucionarias de Colombia), Colombia's major insurgent movement, may give insights with regard to the prospects and the social and political prerequisites for serious peace negotiations and sustainable peaceful development. The economicist approach to the study of relationships of inequality, rebellion, and internal conflict in terms of "greed" and "grievance" or similar dichotomies will also be critically examined with a view to Colombian evidence and experience. Analyzing the complete peace talk scenario in Colombia requires that the character, objectives, and policy of the Colombian government as well as the interests and influences of the Colombian establishment be taken into account. In this context, the main obstacles to and requirements for sincere and efficient peace negotiations and sustainable peace in Colombia will be put forward.


After the failure of the Pastrana administration's peace process with the FARC,1 Álvaro Uribe Vélez won the 2002 presidential elections in Colombia on a promise to take a hard line against the insurgent groups FARC and ELN. When Uribe took office, therefore, the so-called "democratic security" policy was introduced and this policy has since then been applied by the government. The policy involves, in essence, a strong effort to strengthen the military power and territorial control of the Colombian armed forces, and a sustained military offensive against the insurgent groups to bring them back to the negotiation table in a considerably debilitated and more acquiescent condition. As a complement to the strengthening of the regular armed forces, units of "peasant soldiers" and a nationwide network of informants were created.

In May 2006 Uribe was re-elected after having mobilized enough political support in Congress to impose necessary changes in the 1991 Constitution, which originally did not allow consecutive re-election of the president. Uribe won the election with 62 percent of the vote, followed by the moderate left coalition Polo Democratico Alternativo (22 percent). Participation in the elections was very low. The voter turnout reached only 45.1 percent. Mounting evidence and revelations of widespread paramilitary influence and intervention during the past (and the preceding) elections,2 however, as well as alliances between paramilitary leaders and numerous regional and local politicians aligned with Uribe, tend to cast very serious doubt on the legitimacy of Uribe as well as the present Colombian government and Congress.3

Well into Uribe's second term, progress in terms of peace, peace negotiations, or even a humanitarian agreement has been virtually absent, and the most important insurgent group, PARC, has not shown any signs of military weakness nor willingness to enter peace negotiations with the second Uribe administration. ELN entered into exploratory talks with the government in 2005, but so far the parties have not advanced beyond discussing the impending agenda for real peace negotiations.

In July 2003 the government initiated a highly controversial demobilization process with the paramilitary umbrella organization United Self-Defense Forces of Colombia (Autodefensas Unidas de Colombia, AUC). The negotiation process was quite secretive, evolving, as it is still evolving, under constant paramilitary violations of the cessation of hostilities agreed with the government in December 2002.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Greed or Social Injustice? Competing Approaches to Conflict Resolution and Sustainable Peace in Colombia


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?