Globalization, Governance and the State: Some Propositions about Governing

By Peters, B. Guy | Ibero-americana, January 1, 2007 | Go to article overview

Globalization, Governance and the State: Some Propositions about Governing


Peters, B. Guy, Ibero-americana


I. INTRODUCTION

The conventional model of governance is based on the role of the State and its various organizations in making and implementing laws. This model is not only centered on the State, but is also hierarchical, with authoritative decisions made at the top of the hierarchy of government flowing downward through the remainder of the system to the public. Further, in this conventional model most of the action of governing occurs within government itself, excluding actors in the civil society as well and international actors that may have some influence on decisions. Much of this model is also premised on a centralized state, with sub-national governments being largely dependent upon central government.

The conventional model of governance has been under attack from above, from below, and from outside. Indeed, scholars operating from a number of perspectives have tended to denigrate the role of the State and government in the process of governing, and assume that it is possible to have "governance without government" (Rhodes, 1997), or alternatively "policy without polity" (Hajer, 2003). For others the State is powerless in the face of a powerful international market (Strange, 1998; see Reich, 2005), or has been fundamentally changed in terms of structure as well as its own image (Migdal and Schlichte, 2005). The assumption is that the State is no longer capable of governing in any meaningful manner, and hence alternatives are necessary to provide direction to the economy and society.

Before moving to discuss important propositions about the changing role of the State in governing, I need to discuss the meaning of the term "governance". To some extent governance has been like words in Alice in Wonderland-it means exactly what each scholar wants it to mean. In particular, some scholars tend to beg the question of governance by arguing that any actions through which non-State actors influence actions and policy is "governance", thereby setting a very high standard for any action not to be governance. Thus, by definition, in this definition of the term the State is largely excluded from "governance".

In this paper I am conceptualizing governance more broadly. Governance will be used to mean the process of providing direction to the economy and society. Governance therefore is will be conceptualized as a goal directed activity, requiring the means of identifying what society wants to do, and then examining the means of achieving those collective goals. And it is important to note that any understanding of governance should focus attention on the pursuit of collective goals, rather than on the goals of individual actors or groups. Given that there is more than a little diversity in the goals being pursued by individual actors, governance therefore requires mechanisms for resolving the inherent conflicts, and that collective nature of the process in turn may return government and the State to a more central position in governing.1

This definition of governance does not beg the question about the role of State actions or social actors in the process, but instead leaves the role of those various actors open as an empirical question. Indeed, beginning with this definition, a major part of the analysis of the governance process is to determine the role of the various actors, and to understand something about the interaction of State, international and social actors involved in the process of governing. Few, if any, processes for steering society are so simple that any single actor will be able to determine the outcomes alone. That has almost certainly been true in the past (see Pierre and Peters, 2000) governing has become more complex and hence understanding the complexity have become at once more difficult and more necessary.

In addition to the generalized conception of governance, the term has been discussed with a number of adjectives (Adam, 2000). Most commonly, there has been a concern about "good governance", which has come to mean primarily governing, especially in less developed political systems, in a more open and transparent manner than has been true in those systems in the past. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Globalization, Governance and the State: Some Propositions about Governing
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.