Comparative Strategic Positioning of Four Academic Administrative Models: Bureaucracy, Technocracy, Meritocracy, and Kakistocracy

By Parhizgar, Kamal Dean; Parhizgar, Suzan S. | Competition Forum, January 1, 2007 | Go to article overview

Comparative Strategic Positioning of Four Academic Administrative Models: Bureaucracy, Technocracy, Meritocracy, and Kakistocracy


Parhizgar, Kamal Dean, Parhizgar, Suzan S., Competition Forum


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

In this paper, first we have introduced the Strategic Position and Action Evaluation (SPACE) matrix and its dimensions. Second, we have presented four distinct illustrative scenarios to identify the effect of positioning of an institutional academic administrative performance in terms of constraints and the possible leverage conditions. This discussion is then followed by a discussion of certain desirable positioning strategies that administrators should strive for in the long run, given their institution's current status and the constraints facing it. After that we have presented our future research direction in this respect in terms of academic freedom, political censorship, economic hardship, and technological synergy. The SPACE matrix introduces concepts and tools for addressing the type of academic administrative leadership styles as: bureaucracy, technocracy, meritocracy, and kakistocracy.

Keywords: Bureaucracy, Technocracy, Meritocracy, and Kakistocracy

INTRODUCTION

In the field of higher educational administration, there are numerous reasons that have been declared by researchers, authors, experts, and administrators as to why a centralized higher educational system in an authoritative country or in colleges and universities in a democratic society should engage in strategic management processes. There is little about the dominant role that change has played in our contemporary society and that is nowhere more evident than in higher educational institutions. Without exception, all colleges and universities today are vibrating from the forces of change. These forces can be summarized into general scientific advancement, technological development, political crisis, and social disputes. The amount of knowledge has an accelerated path. At last, not at least, a majority of young men, women, and racial minority groups are participating in the colleges and universities. They are going into the workforce too. Adults are coming back to colleges and universities to be reeducated with new knowledge and to grasp the new digestive images of modern technological life. Therefore, people's expectations of colleges and universities are varied. The irony about change is that it makes planning more difficult and complex if colleges and universities are planning and desiring to serve diverse groups of applicants. They should be functionally prepared for such academic services. The best type of planning that appears to be the most appropriate form for the future is strategic planning.

On the other hand, on the basis of all the facts, colleges and universities have been advised to conduct market research, monitor trends in alumni's occupational success, and maintain the academic excellence in their environment. Colleges and universities are forced to increase their flexibility (hiring part-time faculty members as lecturers, limiting tenure awards, initiating post-tenure review, relaxing regulations, and serving community's labor and manpower demands) and updating their academic program offerings. Yet, on rare occasions, few academic leaders are able and willing to focus systematically on change. They are largely taken up by today's academic activities and administrative operations. However, colleges and universities need not just to react to the changes. They can be proactive or even make changes happen.

In sum, strategic management in higher educational systems allows colleges and universities to base their decisions on longrange forecasts, not spur-of-the moment reactions. It allows them to take action at an early stage of a new generation and consider the lead-time for effective administrative decision-making processes and practices. There is a general concern that why top administrators and educational leaders must manage strategically their institutional planning. They cannot make decisions based on long-standing rules, policies, standards of admissions or academic performances, instructional designs, and operational programs. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Comparative Strategic Positioning of Four Academic Administrative Models: Bureaucracy, Technocracy, Meritocracy, and Kakistocracy
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.