Analyzing Landowner Demand for Wildlife and Forest Management Information

By Munn, Ian A.; Hussain, Anwar et al. | Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, December 2007 | Go to article overview

Analyzing Landowner Demand for Wildlife and Forest Management Information


Munn, Ian A., Hussain, Anwar, West, Ben, Grado, Stephen C., Jones, W. Daryl, Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics


Determining appropriate topics and target audiences is essential to design effective educational outreach programs. Based on landowner responses to a mail survey, we determined both the importance and the availability of wildlife and forest management information topics to Mississippi landowners. Combining this information clearly identified the appropriate subject matter for outreach programs-topics important to landowners and for which information was relatively unavailable. The importance of wildlife and forest management information relative to its availability depended on the region, land use patterns, and landowner characteristics, thus demonstrating which segments of the population should be targeted to maximize program impact.

Key Words: complementary log-log link, landowner information needs, odds ratio, ordinal regression, outreach program budget

JEL Classifications: C25, Q16, Q23, Q26

Landowner demand for wildlife and forest management information derives from the potential contribution of this information to their land management objectives. The relative importance of various types of wildlife and forest management information can, however, change for a variety of reasons, such as landowner capacity to absorb information, production technology, and/or market dynamics (Feather and Amacher; Just et al.; Lichtenberg and Zimmerman). Consequently, landowner interest in wildlife and forest management information can be expected to change accordingly. Current research on the state of public wildlife and forest management education programs, however, seems to be disproportionately focused on the supply rather than demand side issues of wildlife and forest management information. Commenting on the state of forestry extension education in Mississippi, for instance, Londo noted that a vast majority of the state landowners did not have enough knowledge of conservation programs even though such information is freely available from the forestry and wildlife extension service. Bensel reported that in northwestern Pennsylvania the term "forest certification" meant something different to various landowners and that some already believe they are certified because of their participation in otherwise similar programs that tout sustainability. Measells et al. found that few landowners benefit from available forestry educational programs. In the face of scare public funds, the results of these studies actually raise questions about (1) the amount and composition of wildlife and forest management information currently supplied by forestry and wildlife extension officials, (2) landowners' understanding of the information, and (3) whether they benefit from it.

The following questions, in particular, arise. Is there a mismatch between what information landowners want and what information is provided? Have existing program services become redundant because landowners' needs have evolved? Are forestry and wildlife program managers using ineffective conveyance methods? Answers to these questions are important because limited public resources and changing information needs of nonindustrial private landowners suggest that wildlife and forest managers need to make their educational programs more relevant. In the past five years, one-third of the United States and its territories reduced overall forestry program expenditures with the remaining states making major reallocations across various program components because of budgetary constraints (National Association of State Foresters).

Subscribing to the notion that landowners are rational and would maximize the use of available information, in this paper we analyzed the potential for a mismatch between what wildlife and forest management information is available and what is needed by Mississippi landowners. In particular, we asked landowners to rank both the importance and availability of information for several wildlife and forest management topics. By analyzing their responses, we were able to identify topics that landowners deemed relatively important to their land management goals and for which information was relatively unavailable. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Analyzing Landowner Demand for Wildlife and Forest Management Information
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.