Workplace Diversity: Is It a Justification for Proportional Representation in the Workplace?

By Robinson, Robert K.; Reithel, Brian J. et al. | Journal of Business and Entrepreneurship, March 2001 | Go to article overview

Workplace Diversity: Is It a Justification for Proportional Representation in the Workplace?


Robinson, Robert K., Reithel, Brian J., Franklin, Geralyn McClure, Journal of Business and Entrepreneurship


ABSTRACT

In 1987, the Hudson Institute released its demographic study of the United States, Workforce 2000. It immediately captured the attention of many employers, both small and large, because of predictions of a higher than expected influx of women and ethnic minorities into the American workforce. According to the Hudson Institute's projections, only 15 percent of new workers entering the labor force in the 1990s would be white males; the remainder would consist of females and members of ethnic minorities. The consequences of such rapid demographic shifts gave rise to the study of the implications of a more diverse workforce and society. Within one year of the publication of Workforce 2000, the first articles advising businesses and organizations how to capitalize on this diversity were being published (Copeland, 1988; Marmer-Solomon, 1989). Simultaneously, diversity consultants began attaining legitimacy in the business community, and many of their solutions were gaining general acceptance.

A PROBLEM WITH DEFINITIONS

Since 1987, the term diversity has become one of those ethereal words which is increasingly difficult to define. Diversity means many things to many people. Organizations have been following varying strategies from recognizing to embracing diversity in the workplace. As an example, Robinson, Franklin, and Terpstra (1994) identified a continuum of four strategies that organizations use to cope with diversity: (1) awareness, (2) accommodation, (3) affirmative action, and (4) alternative change and commitment that is required for each strategy. Awareness, the simplest category of policy modification, assumes that firms adopting this strategy follow trends in their relevant labor markets and note the increased participation of women and ethnic minorities. The second option on the continuum, accommodation, assumes that organizations following this strategy choose to adapt some of their policies to the anticipated labor force development, primarily seeking to attract and retain certain classes of employees with a minimum disruption of production processes, workplace rules and procedures, and management styles. The affirmative action strategy argues that in the absence of discriminatory intent, an employer's internal workplace should mirror its external labor market. As will be discussed in more detail later, this strategy may run afoul of Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) statutes. Finally, the alternative standards strategy advocates understanding that women and ethnic minorities often exhibit different workplace behaviors, and as a result, it is suggested, and even encouraged, that women and ethnic minorities be treated differently by their employers. Like the affirmative action strategy, the alternative standards strategy poses some very serious conflicts with existing EEO laws.

Interestingly, diversity is far more inclusive than the protected classes that many human resource managers associate with current EEO laws and affirmative action regulations. In addition to including ethnicity, sex, race, age, and disability (the statutorily protected classes), diversity may also apply to sexual preference (Kaplan & Lucas, 1996). However, diversity invariably encourages employers to become aware of cultural differences among their workers and modify employment practices accordingly.

Not surprisingly, the academic community's interest in diversity quickly coalesced into an identifiable diversity movement. And though the goals of this movement run the gamut from calling for social action to demanding political power, and all points in between, when it comes to organizational policy, two basic tenets have emerged: (1) heterogeneous, or diverse, work groups are preferable to homogeneous ones; and (2) organizations must learn to accommodate the different needs of these diverse groups in the workplace (Herriot & Pemberton, 1995; Baytos, 1995). The former tenet holds that diversity itself is an organizational strength which should be valued and actively pursued (Thomas, 1991; Loden & Rosener, 1991; Cross, 1994; Fernandez & Barr, 1993; Fernandez, 1991). …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Workplace Diversity: Is It a Justification for Proportional Representation in the Workplace?
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.