The Effect of Firm Size on the Interrelationship between Capital Techniques and Strategic Planning Tools: An Exploratory Study

By Miles, Morgan P.; White, John B. et al. | Journal of Business and Entrepreneurship, October 1993 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

The Effect of Firm Size on the Interrelationship between Capital Techniques and Strategic Planning Tools: An Exploratory Study

Miles, Morgan P., White, John B., Robideaux, Douglas R., Journal of Business and Entrepreneurship


The present study attempts to explore empirically the effect of size on the interrelationship between capital budgeting techniques and strategic planning tools, in both dominant and rapidly growing U.S. based corporations. Samples are drawn from two distinct populations: the Fortune 500 and the INC 500. A mail survey was utilized to collect data on the adoption of capital budgeting and strategic planning tools. The findings suggest that there is currently a high level of coordination between the adoption of strategic planning methods and capital budgeting techniques, and that large firms typically utilize more than one technique during the strategic planning process. The major conclusion that can be drawn from the present study is that adoptors of discounted cash flow capital budgeting techniques also tend to adopt the more sophisticated environmental analyses and portfolio models strategic planning tools, regardless of firm size.


The current American cultural and economic crisis, with its associated trade deficits, unemployment lines, increasing numbers of homeless (Hill & Stamey, 1990), and ever-lowering standards of living, has as a possible antecedent the inability of dominant U.S. corporations to fully consider the long run strategic implications of their financial decisions. Wensley (1981) suggests that the conscious integration or financial and marketing strategic planning tools is essential for optimal long-term resource allocations. Each capital investment decision that a firm makes ultimately affects its future strategic posture.

A plausible explanation for the decline of American economic international competitiveness is the shorter term focus of domestic private and institutional investors and, hence, corporate boards of directors that has come about concurrently with the emergence of modern financial theory as the dominant, and often exclusive, decision making criterion (Reich, 1983). U. S. competitive performance is in sharp contrast to that of Japanese based corporations which have tended to have great appreciation for the long-term strategic implications of their decisions (Reich, 1983; Anderson, 1991). The historic willingness of the Japanese to undertake projects with very distant payoffs (Gemmell, 1991) may be due to some extent to the underlying cultural and economic functions of keiretsus.

Keiretsus are institutions centered around large Japanese conglomerates exhibiting feudallike control over a highly coordinated vertical intra-organizational system of firms (Sakai, 1990). The keiretsus consist of a design, manufacturing, financing, and marketing system composed of thousands of smaller subcontractors, with interlocking ownership and management with banks and other marketers in a wide variety of industries and markets (Sakai, 1990). Finance researchers suggest that the conglomerates dominating the keiretsus may enjoy a lower cost of capital due to captive financial institutions and internal funding (Anderson, 1991; Frankel, 1991; Katz, 1991), and hence are typically more future oriented than their U S. competitors. As an example of the long-run strategic horizon of Japan's powerful keiretsus, Matsushita Electric Industrial Company, the parent of Panasonic, Quasar, National, and Technics brands, is alleged to have a 250-year strategic planning horizon, forcing the explicit consideration of the effect of current decisions on the corporation's long-term strategic posture (Frontline Series, 1992).

A currently significant example of the need for an explicit interrelationship between financial decision making and strategic planning can be found in an analysis of the detrimental effects on U.S. industrial competitiveness due to outsourcing (Bettis, Bradley & Hamel, 1992). Bettis, Bradley, and Hamel (1992) found that as U.S. boards felt increasing pressure from shareholders to improve financial performance, they typically would consider both cost reduction or revenue enhancing strategies.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

The Effect of Firm Size on the Interrelationship between Capital Techniques and Strategic Planning Tools: An Exploratory Study


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?