The Interaction with Disabled Persons Scale: A Validation with UK Midwives

By Wallymahmed, Akhtar H.; McKay-Moffat, Stella F. et al. | Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal, September 10, 2007 | Go to article overview

The Interaction with Disabled Persons Scale: A Validation with UK Midwives


Wallymahmed, Akhtar H., McKay-Moffat, Stella F., Cunningham, Cliff C., Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal


The Interaction with Disabled Persons Scale (TDP) was designed to measure attitudes towards people with disabilities (Gething, 1991). Using exploratory factor analysis with the 20 items scale, Gething (1994) concluded that the scale has six stable and relatively related factors. In the present study, the IDP was used with a sample of 244 trained midwives to examine the psychometric properties of the IDP, particularly to test Gething's (1994) six-factor and MacLean and Ganon's (1995) two-factor models. As found by Loo (2001), the current study supports neither the six-factor nor the two-factor models of previous studies.

Keywords: midwives, attitudes, disabilities, IDP, factor analysis.

Measuring public and professional attitudes to persons with disabilities has received much attention over the last four decades, firstly to examine factors associated with such attitudes, and secondly to evaluate changes in attitudes following educational interventions. The measures are generally based on the argument that attitudes have three components: affect, beliefs, and behavior (e.g., Fishbein, 1967) and therefore, one's attitudes are made up of positive and negative reactions toward an object associated with specific beliefs that tend to impel the individual to behave in a certain way (Yuker, 1988). Available scales focus either on the societal level and measure attitudes in terms of perceived differences between people with and without disability, or the personal level and the respondents' reactions to people with disabilities. Leonard and Crawford (1989) succinctly illustrated the difference in relation to behavior: people with an intellectual disability have the right to live in the community (societal level) but not next door to me (personal level).

The most widely used and validated scale on the societal level is the Attitude Toward Disabled Persons (ATDP) (Yuker, Block, & Campbell, 1960; Yuker, Block, & Young, 1970). Others include the Scale of Attitudes towards Disabled Persons (Antonak, 1980), and the Mental Retardation Misconceptions Scale (Antonak, 1982; Antonak & Livneh, 1988). However, all three scales, have been reported as having poor internal consistency and a lack of stability over time (Beckwith & Matthews, 1994).

The most widely used and validated scale on the personal level is the Interaction with Disabled People Scale (IDP; Gething, 1991; Gething & Wheeler, 1992). According to Gething (1994) the scale measures discomfort during interactions with people with disabilities. She proposed that the discomfort is associated with feeling uninformed and uncertain of how to behave and what to expect when engaging with people with disabilities, and reflects a "succumbing framework which emphasizes tragedy and limitations associated with disability, reactions associated with not having a disability, and feelings of vulnerability about the possibility of becoming disabled oneself' (p. 25).

The scale was developed in 1980 and a series of reliability and validity studies were completed. Between 1988 and 1990, 6000 data cases from a cross section of the Australian population were combined for the standardization project (Gething, 1994). Internal consistency was assessed on IS occasions with Cronbach's alpha coefficients ranging from 0.74 to 0.86. Gething (1991) reported that the use of a series of exploratory factor analyses using principle components analyses and varimax rotations resulted in five- and six- factor models with eigenvalues of at least 1.00. The first three factors explained most of the variance and the fifth and sixth were left unlabelled. In 1994 she reported the analysis on 12 data sets and concluded that the scale had six stable and related factors and the items fell consistently into categories, with the exception of items 8 and 19. In order to examine potential changes in attitudes over the decade, she also applied a maximum-likelihood solution with oblique rotation based on eigenvalues of unrotated factors of 1. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

The Interaction with Disabled Persons Scale: A Validation with UK Midwives
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.