The Human Animal: Developmental Changes in Judgments of Taxonomic and Psychological Similarity among Humans and Other Animals

By Coley, John D. | Cognitie, Creier, Comportament, December 2007 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

The Human Animal: Developmental Changes in Judgments of Taxonomic and Psychological Similarity among Humans and Other Animals


Coley, John D., Cognitie, Creier, Comportament


ABSTRACT

A triad oddity task was used to investigate developmental changes in perceived similarity among animals and humans. Four, five, seven, and eight year-old children and undergraduates were presented with triads consisting of a human, a non-human primate, and a non-primate animal, and asked about taxonomic similarity ("which two are the same kind of thing?") and psychological similarity ("which two think and feel the same way?"). At all age groups, humans were seen as taxonomically unique. Beliefs about psychological similarity underwent marked developmental change, from essentially random guessing to belief that humans were psychologically unique to beliefs that humans were psychologically similar to other primates. There was little evidence of differentiation between psychological and taxonomic similarity among children. Younger children's responses were apparently guided solely by the human-nonhuman dichotomy, whereas older children and undergraduates were also influenced by the category mammal. Results suggest interesting continuities and discontinuities in the development of folk biological thought, and between folk and scientific biology.

KEYWORDS: similarity, folk biology, conceptual development.

One important challenge in the development of any conceptual domain is establishing an ontology, or delineation of the basic entities that exist in that domain and the important relations that hold among those entities (Wellman & Gelman, 1992). In the domain of biology the ontology is particularly richly structured (e.g, Berlin, 1992); with development, understanding of relations among biological kinds becomes increasingly complex and multifaceted. For example, children become increasingly aware of plants' status as living things (Richards & Siegler, 1986), of taxonomic groupings of plants and animals at different levels of hierarchy (Carey, 1985; Coley, Hayes, Lawson, & Moloney, 2004; Coley, Solomon, & Shafto, 2002; Ross, Medin, Coley, & Atran, 2003), and of ecological and causal relations among species that are potentially orthogonal to taxonomic relations (Coley, Vitkin, Seaton, & Yopchick, 2005).

Another important development involves the way in which human beings are incorporated into the folk taxonomy of living things. Clearly, humans are unique among species in many ways; as such, are humans ever incorporated into the broader folk taxonomy? Are humans seen as similar to other species in some ways, and unique in other ways? How do these beliefs change over the course of development? In this paper I examine these questions by focusing on developmental changes in perceived similarity between humans and other animals. I also focus on two related questions: to what degree does the perceived similarity of humans to other animals depend on the nature of similarity being considered, and to what degree is perceived similarity modulated by sensitivity to intermediatelevel animal categories?

Humans' place in folk biological taxonomy

According to geneticists, humans are African great apes. Our closest living relatives are chimpanzees and bonobos, with whom we share a common ancestor that lived c. 5-8 million years ago. Indeed, we are more closely related to chimpanzees and bonobos than either of those are to the gorilla, our next closest primate relative. However, folk biological taxonomies-particularly those found in industrialized western societies-tend to see humans as essentially separate from other species. Indeed, on some accounts, learning that humans are biologically "one animal among many" is a major developmental milestone in the acquisition of biological understanding.

For example, according to the "conceptual change" view first outlined by Susan Carey in her seminal 1985 book (see also Carey, 1995; Carey & Spelke, 1996; Johnson & Carey, 1998) children's understanding of animals is initially embedded in the core domain of intuitive psychology wherein behavior and intention rather than biological process are the central components.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

The Human Animal: Developmental Changes in Judgments of Taxonomic and Psychological Similarity among Humans and Other Animals
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?