Political Transition without Transformation: The Dialectic of Liberalization without Democratization in Kenya and Zambia

By Nasong'o, Shadrack Wanjala | African Studies Review, April 2007 | Go to article overview

Political Transition without Transformation: The Dialectic of Liberalization without Democratization in Kenya and Zambia


Nasong'o, Shadrack Wanjala, African Studies Review


Abstract:

The decade from 1990 to 2000 saw a total of seventy-eight top leadership elections involving forty-three of the forty-eight sub-Saharan African countries. Of these, only twenty-one elections led to power transition from an incumbent to an opposition political party in nineteen countries. Paradoxically, even where there was such transition, authoritarian tendencies persisted. Focusing on Kenya and Zambia, this article argues and seeks to demonstrate that the limited number of transitions from an incumbent regime to an opposition party and the persistence of authoritarianism are a function of political liberalization without democratization of political institutions and rules of the political game.

Introduction

The decade from 1990 to 2000 was a period of sustained political activity in Africa leading toward democratization. During this period, most of die African countries shifted from single-party authoritarianism or military dictatorship to multiparty polities. Whereas in some cases (such as Cape Verde, Benin, Madagascar, Malawi, Mali, and Zambia) this transition resulted in the ouster of old authoritarian regimes, in others (such as Cameroon, Cote dTvoire, Kenya, Togo, and Zimbabwe) the old authoritarian regimes continued to reproduce themselves in power. Even where new regimes emerged, autiioritarian tendencies persisted, as the case of Chiluba's Zambia illustrates. Focusing specifically on the centrality of electoral system design to electoral contests and their outcomes, this article argues that the limited transitions from incumbent regimes and the persistence of authoritarianism are a function of effecting political liberalization without democratizing the political systems and the rules of the game. By political liberalization I mean the mere act of legalization of opposition political parties and their freedom to contest political office. Democratization, by contrast, entails redesigning the rules of the game, especially the electoral system, to make political competition fairer and restructuring governance institutions to take account of the changed political landscape and to make them more responsive and accountable to the electorate.

The article begins with an exposition of types of electoral systems and then examines the electoral outcomes of the first multiparty elections in selected countries in Africa. It then focuses on the cases of Kenya and Zambia, and finally delineates the implications of political transition without transformation of the rules of the game. The significance of the two cases lies in the contradictory scenarios they present, despite their similarities in social and political circumstances, in regard to democratic advancement in Africa. Kenya and Zambia are former British colonies. They achieved political independence within one year of each other. In both countries the process of political consolidation saw a falling out between the president and his vice president, laying the ground for the establishment of singleparty states. By the time of the 1990s wave of democratization, both Kenya and Zambia were single-party states by law. Yet in Zambia in 1991, the opposition united against the incumbent to score the first opposition electoral victory in 1990s elections in Africa. In Kenya, the opposition was fragmented, facilitating the incumbent party's ability to retain power in both the 1992 and 1997 elections. In the third multiparty elections in the two countries, the situation was reversed; in Zambia in 2001, opposition fragmentation facilitated victory for the new incumbent, while in Kenya in 2002 the opposition united to edge out the authoritarian incumbent. These contradictory scenarios are a function of the electoral system's design in the two countries, a crucial determinant of political competitiveness and, ipso facto, of electoral outcomes.

Institutional Design for Democracy

The aspiration for democratic rule is an almost universal phenomenon, as illustrated by the ubiquitous wave of democratization across the world at the close of the last century. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Political Transition without Transformation: The Dialectic of Liberalization without Democratization in Kenya and Zambia
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.