Law Review Digests-Primary and Secondary Education

Journal of Law and Education, January 2008 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Law Review Digests-Primary and Secondary Education


Articles

Johnny Rex Buckles, The Constitutionality of the Monkey Wrench: Exploring the case for Intelligent Design, 59 Okla. L. Rev. 527 (2006). This article argues that teaching intelligent design in public school science classrooms may be constitutionally permissible in some cases, and that a decision to forbid the teaching of intelligent design may be impermissible. The author surveys Supreme Court cases that provide the legal background necessary to analyze the constitutional implications of teaching intelligent design. Courts must scrutinize auricular offerings that purport to teach intelligent design in public schools, but if properly structured, courts must not dismiss the idea as the latest version of Biblical creationism masquerading in scientific terminology.

Wendy F. Hensel, Sharing the Short Bus: Eligibility and Identity under the IDEA, 58 Hastings L.J. 1147 (2007). This article tracks the development of laws intended to protect disabled students tiirough the Individuals witii Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004 (IDEA). There has been a gradual expansion of the characteristics used to determine whetiier a student requires disability services. The current struggle in the debate centers on this expansion and the impact it has on the limited resources available to school districts. The author argues mat narrowing the view will still consume resources because schools will be required to provide services for poorly performing students whetiier or not tiiey are labeled disabled. Shifting the focus from how student disabilities are recognized to the extent of services available to disabled students will continue to lessen the stigma incurred from a diagnosed disability.

Danielle Holley-Walker, The Importance of Negotiated Rulemaking to the No Child Left Behind Act, 85 Neb. L. Rev. 1015 (2007). This article examines the failure of NCLB by criticizing the day-to-day administration of the Act and its impact on schools and students. To develop regulations for implementing NCLB, Congress directed the use of negotiated rulemaking, a process where the Department of Education collaborates with state education boards, school districts, teachers, parents, and students. The author argues tiiat failing to utilize this process for NCLB has created greater bureaucracy for school systems and increased conflict between the states and federal government. In order for NCLB to succeed, tiiere must be significant participation throughout the process from all NCLB stakeholders.

Rita J. Verga, Policing Their Space: The First Amendment Parameters of School Discipline of Student Cyberspeech, 23 Santa Clara Computer & High Tech. L.J. 727 (2007). Drawing from specific examples occurring in Pennsylvania, this article addresses whether and when disciplinary action may be taken against public school students who engage in both on and off-campus cyber speech. The author applies Supreme Court cases to the Pennsylvania cyber speech situations and develops several bright-line rules for schools to follow. The author believes that conflicts over cyber speech will diminish, but not cease completely, as students, teachers, and administrators better understand each others' perspectives and the boundaries of their respective legal rights.

Lindsay Perez Huber, Robin N. Johnson, and Rita Kohli, Naming Racism: A Conceptual Look at Internalized Racism in U.S. Schools, 26 Chicana/o-Latina/o L. Rev. 183 (2006). This article takes a comprehensive look at internalized racism within schools. The article begins by discussing previous research on internalized racism in both psychology and education. Next, the autiiors examine the ways in which racism manifests in teachers, curriculum, and resources in the school. The article ends with an examination of the possible consequences students of color face as a result of internalized racism.

Harry G. Hutchison, Shaming Kindergarteners? Channeling Dred Scott? Freedom of Expression Rights in Public Schools, 56 Cath.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Law Review Digests-Primary and Secondary Education
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?