Beyond the Public Hearing: Citizen Participation in the Local Government Budget Process

By Ebdon, Carol | Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, Summer 2002 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Beyond the Public Hearing: Citizen Participation in the Local Government Budget Process


Ebdon, Carol, Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management


ABSTRACT. This study explores the use and effects of citizen participation in city budgeting. Interviews were conducted with budget directors in 28 midwestern cities. Participation was found to affect budget decisions, but the public hearing remains the primary formal opportunity for input in most cities. Technology is increasingly being used to expand the budget information available to the public. Budget complexity and citizen disinterest were cited as the major barriers to participation. However, a number of cities have successfully used participation mechanisms in the budget development process that can serve as models for other cities.

INTRODUCTION

Scholars and professional organizations strongly encourage citizen participation in the governance process. Due to the public policy decisions inherent in the budget, the budget process would seem to be a prime opportunity for citizen input. However, the limited empirical research available suggests that citizen involvement in budgeting is not widespread. Do practitioners disagree with academics on the value of citizen input? Is there an intrinsic aspect to the budget process that prevents it? Are there other reasons for the lack of participation?

This study looks at the use of citizen participation in the budget process in cities with populations greater than 25,000. It was designed to explore the following questions: When and how are citizens involved in the budget process? Why is participation not used more? What are the effects of citizen participation? The findings are based on interviews with budget or finance directors in 28 cities in four neighboring states: Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, and Nebraska.

The next section reviews the literature relating to citizen participation and budgeting. The research methodology is then described, followed by the findings of the analysis. The last section presents the conclusions.

PARTICIPATION AND BUDGETING

Citizen participation has received increasing attention in the past decade. An expanded role for citizens in the governance process has been advocated by scholars (Box, 1998; King, Stivers et al, 1998; Schachter, 1997; Thomas, 1995; King, Feltey, & Susel, 1998), and by professional organizations such as the International City/County Management Association (ICMA, 1999). The emphasis on participation can also be seen through changes in administrative functions; Nalbandian (1999) found that city managers have become much more focused on community building and facilitation of participation in public policies in the past ten years.

Citizen participation is seen as a way to reduce the level of citizen distrust in government, and to educate people about government activities. The goal is for citizens to have an active role in decisions and not just be passive "consumers" of government services. This is made difficult by barriers to participation such as lack of knowledge of government, public perceptions that they do not have access or their opinions are unwanted, and citizen apathy and lack of time (Frisby & Bowman, 1996; King, Feltey & Susel, 1998; National Academy of Public Administration, 1999).

However, the positive effects of participation have been demonstrated in the literature. Citizens in cities with more participation have been found to be less cynical about local government (Berman, 1997). The city of Dayton, Ohio uses community boards to improve neighborhoods; with their support, the city has not lost a tax election in twenty years (Gurwitt, 1992). Participation benefits have been reported by both participants (Kathlene & Martin, 1991) and public officials (Watson, Juster & Johnson, 1991).

Advantages of participation vary by the type of mechanism used. Public meetings are open to all, but turnout is often low and attendees might not be representative of the community. Citizen surveys may be generalizable if done scientifically, and can provide valuable information about service priorities and issues, but question wording can affect results, intensity of opinion may not be indicated, and they can be costly.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Beyond the Public Hearing: Citizen Participation in the Local Government Budget Process
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?