The Political Economy of Twenty-First Century Socialism

By Devine, Pat | Soundings, Winter 2007 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

The Political Economy of Twenty-First Century Socialism


Devine, Pat, Soundings


Pat Devine makes the case for a model of socialism based on social ownership and participatory planning.

Historically, socialism was seen as an alternative to capitalism, a new way of organising society, not least economic activity, based on a new set of values - a vision of a good society based on freedom, equality and the planned use of society's commonly owned productive resources to meet human needs. The socialist movement was the movement working towards this end, overlapping with the labour movement but not coterminous with it. In right-wing social democracy, however, socialism became transformed into a set of values to be achieved through redistribution and equality of opportunity within capitalist society (see Anthony Crosland, The Future of Socialism 1956). And the rise of neo-liberalism and the historic failure of Soviet-style state planning have now resulted in much of left social democracy joining with the right in embracing private ownership and market forces as the principal means of organising economic activity. Finally, New Labour has extended market principles and values into the heart of the welfare state, deepening the social crisis or recession which has resulted in Feelbad Britain (www. hegemonics.co.uk).

The progressive, democratic left gathered around Compass and Soundings is understandably not happy with this. Hence, Compass's three programmatic statements - The Good Society, A New Political Economy, and Democracy and the Public Realm, and the three sessions at the Soundings 2007 conference - 'Countering the Social Recession', 'Financialisation and Globalisation', and 'New Political Strategies'. However, none of these addresses the central dilemma posed by Michael Kenny in his review of the Compass statements (Soundings 35, Spring 2007, p101): 'if not state planning, nor the market, then what can be the agent and embodiment of progressive economic governance and public management?'. This article offers a possible answer to Kenny's dilemma in the form of a model of socialism based on the concept of social ownership and a process of participatory planning through negotiated coordination.'

Of course, there are people who, while in some sense believing another world is possible, consider attempts to visualise what such a future world might look like as a waste of time, preferring instead to concentrate on understanding the present. However, movements of resistance to the effects of neo-liberalism, and attempts to create alternatives, are unlikely to cohere into an effective and enduring challenge to the existing capitalist system unless there develops at least a broad, pluralistic sense of what an alternative system might look like. Given the failure of the Soviet model - historically the only systemic attempt so far to build a society based on the principles of classical Marxist socialism - and the end of the era of the social democratic Keynesian welfare state - the apogee of the Polanyian counter-movement against the ravages of the free market - some idea of the architecture of a possible twenty-first century socialism, its principles, institutions and social processes, is urgently needed if the left is to recover its confidence and reclaim its rightful position as the standard bearer of freedom and progress.

A link between present discontents and struggles and a possible future socialism is not hard to find, whether we start from the traditional socialist concern with exploitation and oppression, or the green concern with ecology and the environment, which are of course closely connected. Corporate global business motivated by the relentless pursuit of profit and shareholder value tramples on human and non-human nature alike, destroying jobs, communities and the environment in one place after another as it continuously reshapes the world, driven by market forces in the face of constantly changing profitability opportunities. People, individually and collectively, are buffeted by forces beyond their control, with little if any say over the direction of development of the society in which they live.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

The Political Economy of Twenty-First Century Socialism
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?