The U.S. Supreme Court's 2007 Term: Disparate Pay and Union Dues Issues

Labor Law Journal, Winter 2007 | Go to article overview

The U.S. Supreme Court's 2007 Term: Disparate Pay and Union Dues Issues


Throughout the year, CCH asked recognized experts in the field of labor and employment law for their thoughts on decisions of the U.S. Supreme Court in the labor and employment arena. CCH welcomes the opportunity to share their observations with readers of the Labor Law Journal.

LEDBETTER v. GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER CO.

The U.S. Supreme Court's decision that employees cannot bring Title VII disparate pay claims that allege discrimination occurring outside the statutory limitations period, even when a paycheck is received during that same limitations period,1 provoked a strong response from groups on both sides of the issue. Business groups applauded the decision, calling it fair. Women's rights groups criticized the decision, calling it a step backward for working women.

Affirming the Eleventh Circuit's opinion,2 the Supreme Court explained that "treating pay discrimination as a discrete act, limited to each particular pay-setting decision," the unlawful employment action at issue is the employer's decision regarding the pay differential, not the subsequent issuance of paychecks reflecting that differential. In so holding, the High Court emphasized the distinction between past acts of disparate pay, which occur when employers make adverse pay decisions, and the present effects of those acts, which are found in employees' paychecks, when concluding that Lilly Ledbetter should have challenged Goodyear's alleged intentionally discriminatory pay decision within 180 days of the decision itself.

The controversial 5-4 decision was written by Justice Alito and was joined by Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Scalia, Kennedy and Thomas. Justice Ginsburg, who read a summary of her dissent from the bench, filed the dissenting opinion in which Justices Stevens, Souter and Bryer joined.

Is this really a setback for employees?

When asked how big of a setback the decision is for employees, Professor of Law Charles B. Craver responded that Ledbetter is a significant setback for employees who are illegally underpaid. "Due to the secrecy of salary information and the subtle ways in which salary differentials are generated, employees rarely learn of discriminatory differentials until many months, or even years, after they begin," he said.

At a minimum, Craver hopes the Supreme Court would not begin the running of the limitations period until employees have enough information to know they are victims of unlawful discrimination. Even with this standard, however, he thinks it is unclear how easy it will be to prosecute such lawsuits, since employees often become suspicious of discrimination but fail to take action until they are certain it is taking place.

Civil rights attorney Lynne Bernabei believes the decision makes the pursuit of Title VII disparate pay claims more difficult and thinks that's why there's been such a strong public reaction, based on the strong dissent and the very strong reaction from Congress, that what we're seeing is a sort of disgust with the Supreme Court and how far it has gone against employee rights.

She also believes Ledbetter will spur a repeat of Congress' action in 1991 when Title VII was amended to overturn several Supreme Court rulings that limited the civil rights statutes. According to Bernabei, Congress is beginning to look at all these decisions and is trying to fortify the rights they have already said in legislation employees should have, which the Supreme Court has disregarded. "I think this decision is going to mobilize people who are saying: 'The Supreme Court has really gone off the Reservation.' We need Congress to say: 'No, this is what these laws really mean.'"

Bernabei also speculated that Ledbetter would impact workplace conduct. She felt the decision would give employers a great incentive to hide payroll information so that any, even intentional discrimination, would not be discovered until too late to be actionable.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

The U.S. Supreme Court's 2007 Term: Disparate Pay and Union Dues Issues
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.