Institutional Risk Management Education and Consultation (IRMEC): A Jurisprudent Science Perspective

By Gutheil, Thomas G.; Drogin, Eric Y. et al. | Journal of Psychiatry & Law, Fall 2007 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Institutional Risk Management Education and Consultation (IRMEC): A Jurisprudent Science Perspective


Gutheil, Thomas G., Drogin, Eric Y., Friedman, Rohn S., Journal of Psychiatry & Law


Institutional Risk Management Education and Consultation (IRMEC) represents an application of the combined knowledge bases of occupational and organizational psychiatry, organizational psychology, and forensic psychiatry and psychology, to the specific context of risk management in hospitals and other healthcare organizations. The two primary dimensions of IRMEC are: (1) evaluation and education with respect to psychiatric risk management; and (2) consultation and education with respect to psychiatric aspects of general medical practice. From a "jurisprudent science" perspective, the "science" underlying IRMEC-based treatment interventions is well founded, its "practice" includes harmonizing institutional policy and clinical judgment, and its "roles" are grounded in traditional sources of ethical guidance for psychiatrists and psychologists.

The problem of individual and institutional liability for alleged mental health malpractice needs no emphasis in the present era, but the usual responses of fear, anger and resentment may be replaced usefully by proven and practical professional interventions. This article describes a psychiatrically informed approach to Institutional Risk Management Education and Consultation (IRMEC), analyzed from a Jurisprudent Science perspective that focuses upon the legal correlates of psychiatric science, psychiatric practice, and psychiatric roles (Drogin & Barrett, 2007).

Psychiatric science

Historians have identified instances of medical consultation dating back as far as the 13th century, and by the 19th century this mode of service delivery was widely available to individual practitioners (Brown, Pryzwansky & Schulte, 2006). As the practice of medicine became increasingly institutionalized in the 20th century, the newly established specialty of psychiatric consultation was duly integrated with general hospital and medical school settings (Friedman & Molay, 1994). More recently, the pervasive influence of psychiatric consultation has enabled the participation of allied mental health professions as well (Drogin & Barrett, 2007).

Consultation to an individual patient and clinician has been followed by institutional consultations. These consultations involve the use of psychiatric expertise to address institutional or systems issues. The current range of institutional psychiatric consultation is broad, including consultation for business purposes (addressing organizational behavior, issues in family-owned businesses, motivational issues, and personality assessment in hiring decisions); for governmental purposes (addressing criminal profiling, war game analysis, and interrogation techniques); and for educational purposes (addressing developing education plans for special needs, crisis plans, and development of school-based prevention and treatment plans) (Kahn, 2006). A professional organization, the Academy of Organizational and Occupational Psychiatry, was founded in 1990 to address corporate and workplace psychiatric consultation, and the November 2006 issue of Psychiatric Annals was devoted to "Occupational and Organizational Psychiatry" (Dhaliwal, 2006).

IRMEC represents the application of the knowledge base of occupational and organizational psychiatry, organizational psychology, and forensic psychiatry and psychology to the specific context of risk management in hospitals and other healthcare organizations. There are two primary dimensions of the application of these sciences in this context:

1. Evaluation and Education with Respect to Psychiatric Risk Management: This includes: (a) risk review of the existing systems in a psychiatric treatment context (psychiatric inpatient unit or ambulatory setting), to look for areas in which patient safety and litigation risks may be identified such as policies and procedures for documentation, seclusion and restraint, or risk assessment or architectural standards (Jayaram, 2006); and (b) education regarding psychiatric malpractice, psychiatric risk management, and liability prevention (Fenwick, Vassilas, Carter & Haque, 2004; Mossman & Kapp, 1997).

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Institutional Risk Management Education and Consultation (IRMEC): A Jurisprudent Science Perspective
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?