Court Forces Turnover in Paterno Salary Case

By Albright, Scott | News Media and the Law, Winter 2008 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Court Forces Turnover in Paterno Salary Case

Albright, Scott, News Media and the Law

Pennsylvania high court rules that state must reveal the legendary football coach's earnings despite university objections.

When veteran newspaper reporter Jan Murphy decided to push for the release of salary-related information from Penn State University five years ago, she faced an obstacle as intimidating as any Nittany Lion offensive lineman: Joe Paterno's reputation.

A beloved figure who has coached Penn State's football team for 42 years, Paterno's old-fashioned modesty, his generosity in giving back roughly $4 million over the years to the university and his 372 wins have earned him a degree of fan loyalty that is arguably unmatched in college sports.

Such protective dedication became particularly evident when some fans perceived Murphy's attempts to obtain university financial information that included Paterno's salary as an irreverent breach of the 80-yearold coach's privacy. After the Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled on Nov. 20 that the state's Right to Know Act mandated the information's disclosure, the Patriot-News [Harrisburg] reported Paterno's base salary to be $512,664 in 2007.

"Shame on you, Patriot-News," one reader, identified only as "GT," commented online after reading about Murphy's story as reported by the Chronicle of Higher Education. "You should be raising this man upon your shoulders instead of the...proverbial flaeoole!"

Paterno's salary had been a closely guarded secret for decades. But after the Pennsylvania State Employees' Retirement Board (SERS) agreed to release Paterno and other university officials' salaries to the Patriot-News, the university sued to prevent the disclosure - and lost at every state court level.

The salaries were ultimately revealed after the state's high court found the information to be public because it was submitted voluntarily through a contractual agreement as part of the state's taxpayer-backed pension program. The court found that the salaries were integral components of the pension plan, thereby fitting into one of the state's primary definitions for what constitutes a public record: "an account, voucher or contract dealing with the receipt or disbursement of funds by an agency."

Responding to reader criticisms, both Murphy and Craig Staudenmaier, an attorney who represented the Patriot-News in the litigation, emphasized that the newspaper's intention was never to single out or embarrass Paterno. Rather, the real goal was to shed light on how taxpayer funds were generally being spent by the university, which received $349 million in state legislature-appropriated funds last year alone.

Operating in a state with a notoriously inhibitive open records law, Penn State has a reputation of being particularly secretive when it comes to disclosing financial information, Staudenmaier said. Similar information, including football coaches' salaries, is easily available at other big-time football schools such as Iowa, Oklahoma, Alabama and Florida, according to a USA Today report.

And because the head coaches' salaries at these schools are all above $3 million per year, Paterno's salary of just over $500,000 seems ironically miniscule, given the public records fuss and coach's stature as a proverbial living legend. The USA Today story noted that the average salary of the nation's 120 major college football coaches is near $1 million.

"By today's standards, [Paterno's salary is] a bargain," the Philadelphia Inquirer wrote in November. "So why the big secret all these years?"

Murphy and Staudenmaier noted that SERS had readily been disclosing pension-related information about other state employees, but was seemingly applying a different standard when it came to Perm State figures.

"This case was never about Joe Paterno specifically," said Staudenmaier, who represented the Patriot-News in the lawsuit. "What the case was about was the disparity and unequal treatment under open records law.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Court Forces Turnover in Paterno Salary Case


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?