Coping with Partner Abuse among Mexican American and Anglo Women: Ethnic and Socioeconomic Influences

By Fernández-Esquer, Maria Eugenia; McCloskey, Laura Ann | Violence and Victims, January 1, 1999 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Coping with Partner Abuse among Mexican American and Anglo Women: Ethnic and Socioeconomic Influences


Fernández-Esquer, Maria Eugenia, McCloskey, Laura Ann, Violence and Victims


This exploratory study examines the influence of ethnic group membership and socioeconomic status on the coping strategies reported by women victims of partner abuse. Ninety-three Mexican American and Anglo women recruited from the general community were interviewed after being screened for the presence of partner abuse. Individual coping tactics reported by the respondents were coded as internal focus or external focus coping strategies. Multiple regression results indicate that only socioeconomic status significantly predicts internal focus coping beyond the contribution of ethnicity.

Prior research suggests that different women invoke a wide range of tactics to cope with partner abuse (Blackman, 1989; Frieze & McHugh, 1992; Mills, 1985). However, there have been relatively few attempts to interpret the selection of these coping tactics within a sociocultural framework. The purpose of this exploratory study is to assess the influence of ethnic group membership and socioeconomic status on the coping strategies adopted by women victims of partner abuse.

There is a tendency in the coping literature to assume that patterns of coping are universal and not constructed from the specific coping alternatives indicated by a culture. To date, neither the universality nor the cultural specificity of coping mechanisms has been adequately explored. We do not know, for example, whether reactions to the battering situation are partly due to a person's cultural background, the stress created by socioeconomic conditions, or the interaction of both.

Research examining the relationship between ethnicity and wife battering indicates that Mexican American women born in Mexico and Anglo women experience similar rates of violence by their male partners (Kantor, Jasinski, & Aldarondo, 1994; Sorenson & Telles, 1991). Moreover, Hispanic, African American and Anglo women who reside in batteredwomen shelters report experiencing similar severity of abuse, with Hispanic women reporting the longest duration of abuse and the fewest efforts to seek support (Gondolf, Fisher, & McFerron, 1988). However, Mexican American women born in the U.S. report higher rates of victimization than their counterparts born in Mexico (Sorenson & Telles, 1991). Thus, acculturation and growing up as a minority may increase the risk of victimization among U.S.-born Mexican American women.

Coping

Research on coping typically distinguishes between two general approaches. The first approach concerns coping styles or dispositions and assumes that people develop stable coping repertoires to deal with a variety of problems (Cohen, 1987). From this viewpoint, coping style reflects an internal trait that remains constant across different stressful situations. The second approach examines the match between specific coping strategies and stressful conditions (Lazarus & Folkman, 1984). According to this second view, coping is a function of the specific problem and resources afforded by the context in which the stressor occurs. Situation-specific theories of coping predict that different coping strategies are selected depending on the stressor. The evidence for the first view is mixed. Although coping strategies are presumed to emerge from intraindividual and stable psychological processes, there is evidence that consistency in mode of coping across situations is low. Weak or nonsignificant relationships have been found between coping dispositions (Cohen, 1987), type of stressor (Compas, Forsythe, & Wagner, 1988), and coping behavior.

An emphasis on situational determinants as argued by Lazarus and others (Hill, Hawkins, Raposo, & Carr, 1995; Lazarus, 1980,1993; Lazarus & Folkman, 1984) deserves attention. However, much of this research focuses on proximal factors relating to unique stressors and disregards distal sociocultural factors. The roles of ethnicity, poverty, and socioeconomic status are frequently neglected in studies of coping with some notable exceptions (Belle, 1982).

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Coping with Partner Abuse among Mexican American and Anglo Women: Ethnic and Socioeconomic Influences
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?