Declining Rate of Folate Insufficiency among Adults Following Increased Folic Acid Food Fortification in Canada

By Ray, J. G.; Vermeulen, M. J. et al. | Canadian Journal of Public Health, July/August 2002 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Declining Rate of Folate Insufficiency among Adults Following Increased Folic Acid Food Fortification in Canada


Ray, J. G., Vermeulen, M. J., Boss, S. C., Cole, D. E. C., Canadian Journal of Public Health


ABSTRACT

Objective: Canada introduced a mandatory folic acid food fortification program in November 1998. We investigated whether the rate of folate and vitamin B12 insufficiency among adults has changed since this mandatory fortification program was implemented.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study using a large Ontario laboratory database. We included all individuals who underwent evaluation of their serum folate, red cell folate and serum vitamin 1312 between April 1, 1997 to July 31, 1998 (Period A), August 1, 1998 to January 30, 1999 (Period B) and February 1, 1999 to March 31, 2000 (Period Q.

Results: A total of 8,884 consecutive samples were analyzed during the period of study. Mean age was 57.4 years (SD 21.1), and 63.2% were female. The prevalence of serum folate insufficiency (below 3.4 nmol/L) fell from 0.52% in Period A to 0.22% in Period C [prevalence ratio (RR) 0.41, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.18-0.93)]. The prevalence of red cell folate insufficiency (below 215 nmol/L) declined from 1.78% during Period A to 0.41% in Period C (RR 0.23, 95% Cl 0.14-0.40). No significant difference was observed between periods in the prevalence of B1 2 insufficiency below 120 pmol/L (3.93% versus 3.11 %, respectively; RR 0.79, 95% Cl 0.62-1.01).

Conclusions: There has been a significant decline in the prevalence of folate, but not vitamin B12 insufficiency, following Canadian folic acid food fortification. These changes may have important implications for the prevention and detection of folate and vitamin 1312 insufficiency, including identifying the benefits of folic acid food fortification and the need to further consider fortification or supplementation with vitamin B12.

A Canadian national program was mandated in November 1998 to ncrease folic acid fortification of all flour and some corn and rice products, providing a daily average of 0.1 mg of folic acid. The goal of this initiative was to provide women of reproductive age with higher amounts of dietary folic acid in order to reduce the risk of neural tube defects.1

Since the introduction of this program, we expected that there would be a rise in both the average serum (Se) and red cell (RBC) folate concentrations, but we could not predict what would happen with serum vitamin B12 (Se B12).2 Since vitamin B12 impairment might be more difficult to recognize in the presence of adequate folate stores, this might have widespread public health importance for Canadians.2 In the following report, we examined whether there has been a change in both vitamins within the adult population since this program was implemented.

Data collection

We retrospectively analyzed all consecutive, concomitant and non-redundant serum folate, RBC folate and Se B12 samples previously measured by MDS Laboratories (Toronto, Ontario), a large private laboratory that completes testing on approximately 30% of all B12 and folate measurements across the province of Ontario, paid for under the universal Ontario Health Insurance Plan. Samples were collected from April 1, 1997 to July 31, 1998 (Period A); August 1, 1998 to January 30, 1999 (Period B); and February 1, 1999 to March 31, 2000 (Period C) (Table I). Period B reflected a six-month interval spanning industry-compliance lead and lag times of three months each. The underlying reasons for folate and Se B12 testing were not available, but each patient's physician ordered the sample on clinical grounds. RBC folate, Se folate and Se B12 were measured by competitive protein binding (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Mississauga, Ontario). The maximum reporting limit was 45 nmol/L for Se folate, 1450 nmol/L for RBC folate and 1600 pmol/L for Se 12. The laboratory coefficient of variation (CV) was less than 7% for each of the three assays. Patient identifiers were removed to ensure patient confidentiality, and ethical approval to conduct this study was obtained by the Institutional Review Board of Sunnybrook and Women's College Health Sciences Centre.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Declining Rate of Folate Insufficiency among Adults Following Increased Folic Acid Food Fortification in Canada
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?