Cost-Benefit Models of Stakeholders in the Global Counterfeiting Industry and Marketing Response Strategies

By Amine, Lyn S.; Magnusson, Peter | Multinational Business Review, Summer 2007 | Go to article overview

Cost-Benefit Models of Stakeholders in the Global Counterfeiting Industry and Marketing Response Strategies


Amine, Lyn S., Magnusson, Peter, Multinational Business Review


Abstract:

Global counterfeiting is escalating despite resistance by many parties. We identify three groups of stakeholders who have vested interests in either resisting or promoting counterfeiting. Among resistors to counterfeiting are national governments, international policymakers, and corporate intellectual property owners; among promoters are the counterfeiters themselves and many consumers. We argue that current supply-side resistance approaches alone are inadequate; attention is also needed to resisting consumer promoters on the demand-side of the market. Drawing from a review of the literature, we develop a new analytical framework which depicts complex interfaces between IP owners and consumers. A second framework presents actionable marketing strategies targeted to different consumer segments.

INTRODUCTION

On May 19, 2005, the long-awaited sixth and final movie in the Star Wars saga opened in movie theaters worldwide, but people who did not want to wait for the official release downloaded the movie from the Internet six hours earlier (Wall Street Journal 2005). Surprisingly, each of the last three installments of George Lucas's space saga has become available for download prior to its official release in movie theaters (Jones, 2002). Compare this example of global counterfeiting with Oh's (2006) report of a study by the Center for Academic Integrity at Duke University. Using a sample of nearly 50,000 undergraduate students at sixty-nine institutions, the survey investigated attitudes and behaviors with regard to cheating. In the survey, 26 percent of all respondents admitted to serious cheating on exams; 54 percent admitted to plagiarism. The study's author noted an increase in cheating over the past fifteen years and blames technology for making cheating easier. Student respondents, for their part, used recent corporate and political scandals in the U.S. to justify their behavior.

Although exact numbers are impossible to obtain, estimates of the extent of counterfeiting worldwide range from 5 to 10 percent of world trade. For some industries it is said to reach as high as 30 percent (Trainer 2004). This is equivalent to about $500 billion in lost sales revenue for legitimate companies. Microsoft alone estimated that its revenue would double without software piracy (Oullette 1995). Procter and Gamble estimated that 20 percent of all P&G products sold in China are counterfeits (Strategic Direction 2003). Early in the millennium, fake cars started to appear in China, hurting global market leaders such as Toyota, Honda, and DaimlerChrysler (The Economist 2007). Despite efforts to curb counterfeiting, trends indicate an escalation of illegal activities. This theft of intellectual property (IP) rights through counterfeiting has been called the "billion dollar threat" to the U.S. economy (Paradise 1999). Balfour (2005, 96) has referred to a "counterfeit catastrophe," remarking that the "global economy is at a critical juncture."

These observations draw attention to two dimensions of international marketing: macro-level environmental factors that allow counterfeiting to persist, and micro-level consumer behaviors that perpetuate demand for counterfeit products. Increased counterfeiting along with depressing reports of unethical attitudes and behaviors among consumers and future business leaders do not augur well for future protection of IP rights.

Corporate IP owners paint a dark picture of lost sales, lowered profits, and damaged brand reputations. National governments lose tax dollars and see legitimate local employment opportunities shrink. Governments and international organizations, such as the WTO and the UN, continue to legislate against counterfeiting and try to police global markets. Member nations are exhorted to strengthen their respective IP protection laws and aggressively pursue counterfeiters through the courts (Ostergard 2000). For their part, scholarly researchers have called for suffer legal penalties and more efficient enforcement of laws already on the books and have developed normative guidelines to help corporate IP owners reduce their commercial losses (Kaikati and LaGarce 1980; Bush, Bloch, and Dawson 1989; Harvey and Ronkainen 1985; Harvey 1987; Shultz and Saporito 1996). …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Cost-Benefit Models of Stakeholders in the Global Counterfeiting Industry and Marketing Response Strategies
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.