"Never in Our Lifetime": Legal Marriage for Same-Sex Couples in Long-Term Relationships*

By Porche, Michelle V.; Purvin, Diane M. | Family Relations, April 2008 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

"Never in Our Lifetime": Legal Marriage for Same-Sex Couples in Long-Term Relationships*


Porche, Michelle V., Purvin, Diane M., Family Relations


Abstract:

We present data from 4 lesbian and 5 gay male same-sex couples who have been together 20 years or more. Couples included those legally married and unmarried, with and without children, and were interviewed within the first year legalized same-sex marriage was enacted in Massachusetts. Using life course theory and case study methodology, we investigate supports and constraints related to relationship longevity and how these factors influence the couples' responses to the option of legal marriage decades into their relationships. Seven out of 9 couples married immediately or soon after legalization. The two who did not marry reaffirmed and maintained their commitment. Results are discussed in light of theory and practice within the context of a period of historic change.

Key Words: family diversity, gay/lesbian relationships, marriage, qualitative family research, sexual orientation issues.

Legal marriage for same-sex couples in the United States is limited to the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, yet this recent change is unprecedented and marks a historic shift in our understanding of marriage and family. Although established long-term same-sex relationships are not unique (Blumstein & Schwanz, 1983; Mackey, Diemer, & O'Brien, 2004), the recognition of these relationships as legal and legitimate is both novel and controversial. In this paper, we present data from four lesbian and five gay male same-sex couples who have been together 20 years or more and interviewed within the first year a ruling legalizing same-sex marriage was enacted in Massachusetts. Because individuals undergo developmental changes over the course of their relationships and the relationship itself is subject to historical forces that shape family trajectories, we take a life course approach (Elder, 1994, 1998) to answer the following questions: (a) What supports and constraints are related to relationship longevity? and (b) How do these factors influence the couples' decision making in response to the option of legal marriage decades into their relationships?

Elder (1994, 1998) describes four principles of life course dieory, (a) historical time and place, (b) timing in lives, (c) linked lives, and (d) human agency, that apply to die conceptualization of the present study. Same-sex couples in Massachusetts are uniquely positioned, temporally and geographically, to have the opportunity to marry; choices and actions related to this opportunity may reflect the age of the individuals in the couple, the length of the relationship, and the relationship timing, as well as individual supports and constraints that vary in the context of extended family and social circles. We were particularly interested in same-sex couples in long-term relationships because research suggests that the legally (and often religiously) binding marriage contract influences longevity for heterosexual couples whereas the lack of such barriers for leaving may make it easier to end relationships (Kurdek, 2000; Peplau & Spalding, 2000).

Using qualitative methodology, we investigated the decision-making process for couples who suddenly had the opportunity for state government to legally recognize their union. Applying a multifocal life course lens, we sought to identify the factors that guided their decisions to marry or not and to understand how experiences of supports and constraints in their relationship trajectories influenced these decisions. Supports included the timing of the relationship, legal commitments and agreements including home ownership and estate planning, having children, seeking therapeutic help in managing conflicts, and striving to be monogamous role models. Constraints were related to generation and cohort and included stressors of homophobia and heterosexism. We examined responses from couples who had been together for two decades or more, for all intents and purposes "married" yet not married. Using a life course approach also enabled us to explore the role of major milestones in the couples' lives that may have functioned as proxies to legal marriage as markers of commitment.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

"Never in Our Lifetime": Legal Marriage for Same-Sex Couples in Long-Term Relationships*
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?