The Relationship between Victimization and Cognitive Schemata among Episodically Homeless, Seriously Mentally Ill Women

By Goodman, Lisa A.; Dutton, Mary Ann | Violence and Victims, January 1, 1996 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

The Relationship between Victimization and Cognitive Schemata among Episodically Homeless, Seriously Mentally Ill Women


Goodman, Lisa A., Dutton, Mary Ann, Violence and Victims


This study explored the extent to which specific aspects of violent victimization are associated with cognitive schemata in the context of ongoing, often lifelong, trauma and negative life events. Specifically, we examined the relationships between cognitive schemata (safety, self- and other esteem, intimacy, and trust) and three dimensions of physical and sexual assault histories (recentness, frequency, and variety) among 91 predominantly African American, episodically homeless, seriously mentally ill women. Findings indicated that even in the context of pervasive violence, more frequent, recent, and varied abuse was associated with more negative cognitive schemata. We discuss these findings in the context of research and practice with disenfranchised populations at high risk for violent victimization.

Recent conceptualizations of response to trauma have highlighted the ways in which a traumatic event or condition may invalidate or alter otherwise "healthy" or "positive"1 fundamental beliefs or schemata, including beliefs that the world is benevolent and meaningful, that people are trustworthy and worth relating to, and that the self is worthy (Epstein, 1991, 1994; Horowitz, 1986, 1991; Janoff-Bulman, 1989, 1992; McCann & Pearlman, 1990; McCann, Sakheim, & Abrahamson, 1988; Roth, Lebowitz, & DeRosa, in press). While theories regarding the impact of trauma on cognitive schemata, and the empirical research that supports them (Janoff-Bulman, 1989, 1992; Norris & Kaniasty, 1991), provide a compelling and useful way to understand responses to trauma among some populations, these theories rest on several assumptions that may be less valid for other populations.

Most important, these theories assume, without making these assumptions explicit, that (1) traumatic experiences are one-time events or circumscribed experiences, rather than ongoing conditions; (2) victims of traumatic events have not experienced prior trauma; (3) victims have not experienced multiple and ongoing life stressors such as discrimination or homelessness; and thus, (4) prior to a traumatic event, individuals have relatively positive beliefs about themselves and others (for a notable exception, see Roth, Lebowitz, & DeRosa, in press). Although these assumptions may be valid for many women among the mainstream populations that are usually studied, they do not hold for extremely disenfranchised populations such as those who are homeless, mentally ill, or otherwise marginalized.

Homeless women with serious mental disorders, for example, frequently face a choice between the dangers of life on the street and the hazards of overcrowded, unsafe, and poorly supervised shelters (Hope & Young, 1986; Stefl, 1987). Wherever they choose to live, they may be unable to get enough to eat or enough sleep (Rosnow, Shaw, & Concord, 1985), and be socially isolated (Bassuk & Rosenberg, 1988; Wood, Valdez, Hayashi, & Shen, 1990), distrustful (Goodman, 199la), and vulnerable to serious physical injury and victimization (Gelberg & Linn, 1988; Padgett & Struening, 1992).

For many homeless women, these highly physically and emotionally impoverished conditions began in childhood. Compared to housed women, homeless women report a significantly greater likelihood of having spent time in a foster or group home (D'Ercole & Struening, 1990; Goodman, 1991b; Wood et al., 1990), having run away for a week or more (Shinn, Knickman & Weitzman, 1991), having come from homes where their parents abused drugs or alcohol (Wood et al., 1990), and having been abused as children (Bassuk & Rosenberg, 1988; Shinn, Knickman, & Weitzman, 1991). Indeed, in a recent study of episodically homeless, mentally ill women (Goodman, Dutton, & Harris, 1995), we found that among 99 respondents, 92% had experienced some form of child abuse, and 92% had also experienced some form of adult assault or abuse. A full 87% of the sample reported both child and adult abuse and 97% reported some form of abuse over the lifespan.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

The Relationship between Victimization and Cognitive Schemata among Episodically Homeless, Seriously Mentally Ill Women
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?