Is Cognitive Therapy Ill-Founded? A Commentary on Lyddon and Weill

By Clark, David A. | Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy, January 1, 1997 | Go to article overview

Is Cognitive Therapy Ill-Founded? A Commentary on Lyddon and Weill


Clark, David A., Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy


Lyddon and Weill (in this issue) have concluded that constructivism is preferred over standard cognitive theory and therapy because the latter is based on postmodern assumptions about knowledge, reality and the self. They argue that the postmodern basis of constructivism enables it to address criticisms that social constructivism, feminism and multiculturalism have raised with cognitive psychotherapy. In this commentary I have argued that Lyddon and Weill's evaluation of standard cognitive therapy (CT) is based on a misrepresentation of the basic assumptions of CT concerning knowledge, the social context and the nature of the therapeutic relationship. I conclude that the relative merits of constructivism over standard cognitive therapy cannot be settled by philosophical debate but only by a consideration of the research and treatment innovations offered by each perspective.

Lyddon and Weill (in this issue) have offered a most thoughtful and cogent critique of the philosophical assumptions of standard cognitive therapy (CT) and constructivism in light of postmodern thought. In contrasting the basic philosophical assumptions of modernism and postmodernism they note that the former holds to an objectivist epistemology, views reality as objective and knowable, and considers the self a unitary, integrated entity in which individualism, autonomy and rationality are reified. The postmodern perspective, on the other hand, is said to emphasize a constructivist epistemology, a localized multiple and socially constructed basis to reality, and the self as a fluid, dynamic socially constituted concept. Lyddon and Weill then discuss three movements in postmodern thought-social constructionism, feminism and multiculturalism-and how each offers a critical challenge to cognitive psychotherapy. They conclude that the reliance of standard cognitive theory and therapy on modern assumptions of knowing, reality and the self is untenable at best, and potentially hazardous at worst, at least when encountered within the therapy session. The solution they advance is for cognitive psychotherapists to adopt the constructivist perspective (Mahoney, 1991, 1993; Neimeyer, 1993), thereby shedding the ill-founded modernist assumptions of standard CT.

There can be little doubt that some of the criticisms and cautions raised against standard cognitive theory and therapy by social constructivism, feminism and multiculturalism must be addressed by cognitive psychotherapists. More attention should be paid to the social origins and context of personal beliefs, memories and thoughts, and cognitive therapists must guard against imposing their own view of reality on their clients. Instead therapists must work toward a greater appreciation of the social context and worldviews of their clients, working with their clients in a collaborative manner to empower them to effect the change they seek in their personal and social realities. All therapists, regardless of their school of psychotherapy, should seek to minimize power relations in the therapeutic relationship, and collaborate with clients in the development of personalized goals for change in thought, feeling and behavior. Moreover I would also agree with Lyddon and Weill that cognitive therapists must be wary of overpersonalizing problems to the point where they fail to recognize that change may also be needed in the social environment of the client.

Having outlined these broad areas of agreement, I believe the authors' analysis of standard cognitive therapy is, nonetheless, problematic because of a misrepresentation of the basic assumptions of CT. Based on these misconceptions, the authors arrive at an erroneous conclusion-that constructivist psychotherapy is preferred over standard CT because the former is more consistent with postmodern assumptions. Let me discuss three major errors or misconceptions of standard CT that are evident in this paper.

RATIONALITY AND OBJECTIVE COGNITIVE PROCESSING

The first misconception can be found in Lyddon and Weill's statement that

cognitive theorists such as Ellis and Beck tend to envision the well-adjusted person as either (a) a paragon of rationality who interprets the world in a manner consistent with authorized axioms of rational thoughts or (b) an objective scientist who consistently makes accurate inferences about him/herself and the world (p.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Is Cognitive Therapy Ill-Founded? A Commentary on Lyddon and Weill
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.