Combining Guided Dialog with Cognitive Therapy for Depressed Women: Six Single-Case Studies

By Randall, Elizabeth J.; Thyer, Bruce A. | Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy, January 1, 1998 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Combining Guided Dialog with Cognitive Therapy for Depressed Women: Six Single-Case Studies


Randall, Elizabeth J., Thyer, Bruce A., Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy


Cognitive therapy (CT) alone was compared to CT, plus a communication skills and relationship repair intervention called Guided Dialog (GD), in the treatment of six depressed women. Outcomes measures were the Beck Depression Inventory and the Miller Social Intimacy Scale, repeatedly administered over time in the context of single-subject research designs. Three women received CT alone, and three received CT followed by CT plus GD. Results indicated that all patients recovered from depression; however, patients who received the combined form of treatment registered greater improvements in intimacy than did clients who received cognitive therapy alone. While tentative, these results suggest that the combination of a relationally based form of treatment such as Guided Dialog, together with cognitive therapy, may warrant a more formal randomized trial.

A significant body of empirical evidence supports the association between lack of emotional intimacy and depression for women. In an early study by Brown and Harris (1978) on the social origins of depression, it was found that the lack of an intimate, confiding relationship with a primary significant other was the most important risk factor in the year preceding onset of depression in women. This study has been replicated in more or less detail at least eight times (Brown & Prudo, 1981; Brown, Andrews, Harris, Adler, & Bridge, 1986; Brugha, Bebbington, MacCarthy, Sturt, Wykes, & Potter, 1990; Campbell, Cope, & Teasdale, 1983; Lora & Fava, 1992; Martin, Brown, Goldberg, & Brockington, 1989; Parry & Shapiro, 1986 Paykel, Emms, Fletcher, & Rassaby, 1980).

Numerous superficial relationships have not been found to have a protective effect against depression for women (Miller & Lefcourt, 1982), but at least one intimate, confiding relationship with a partner or significant other can be a buffer against depression, even in the presence of severe life events (Brown & Harris, 1989). A lack of emotional intimacy in the patient's interpersonal world is also more highly correlated with relapse than any other psychosocial variable, including gender, marital status, and socioeconomic status (Belsher & Costello, 1988).

Cognitive therapy, widely recognized as a state-of-the-art individual therapy for depression, is unquestionably effective. Dobson (1989) conducted a meta-analysis of eight studies comparing cognitive therapy versus tricyclics, and found a mean differential effect size of -0.53, with a range of 0.42 to -1.74, based on Cohen's d statistic, where more negative values indicate greater superiority for cognitive therapy. A number of other studies have also demonstrated the effectiveness of cognitive therapy of depression (Beck, Hollon, Young, Bedrosian, & Budenz, 1985; Blackburn, Bishop, Glen, Whalley, & Christie, 1981; Gallagher & Thompson; 1982; Murphy, Simons, Wetzel, & Lustman, 1984).

However, cognitive therapy has been criticized by relational theorists on grounds that the model is insufficiently sensitive to the interpersonal context of depression, particularly for women, who are seen as having a more relationally based view of the world (Jack, 1991). Also problematic, in view of the association between impaired intimacy and depression, is the deemphasis within cognitive therapy on the inclusion of significant others in treatment. One of the standard texts on cognitive therapy contains two paragraphs on the recommended role of significant others in treatment, primarily for purposes of gathering information (Beck, Rush, Shaw, & Emery, 1979). At least three well regarded reference books contain chapters on cognitive therapy which make no mention of bringing significant others into session (Kovacs & Beck, 1986; Newman & Beck, 1990; Sacco & Beck, 1985). This deemphasis on dyadic work leads to the possibility that coping with lack of intimacy could be substituted for improving relationships, a potential limitation to the scope of the cognitive model.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Combining Guided Dialog with Cognitive Therapy for Depressed Women: Six Single-Case Studies
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?