Canaries in the Coal Mine: Facts from Securities Fraud Private Civil Actions Can Identify Intent to Manipulate Energy Markets

By Marcoux, J. Michel | Energy Law Journal, January 1, 2008 | Go to article overview

Canaries in the Coal Mine: Facts from Securities Fraud Private Civil Actions Can Identify Intent to Manipulate Energy Markets


Marcoux, J. Michel, Energy Law Journal


Synopsis:

Congress modeled its Energy Policy Act of 2005 market manipulation provisions on longstanding federal securities law. The EPAct 2005 specifically declared unlawful, for energy markets, any manipulative or deceptive device or contrivance, as those terms are used in federal securities law for securities markets. The FERC and energy industry participants thus can use analogous securities industry precedents as a guide in energy industry litigations. But, in the words of an anonymous FERC practitioner: "What is [manipulation]? How do we know it?" Approaching that pre-eminent question from one angle, market manipulation cannot be proved without evidence of intent, or scienter. Besides the Securities and Exchange Commission's own cases on intent, many additional private party, civil class action federal court cases also analyze securities fraud intent. The U.S. Supreme Court views those private civil actions as an indispensable tool to deter fraud. Analogous facts from those federal court decisions work as do canaries in coal mines,1 helping to identify scienter or its absence in energy industry market manipulation prosecutions, for which the FERC has substantial new penalty powers.

I. SUMMARY AND INTRODUCTION

The Energy Policy Act of 2005 (EPAct 2005)2 requires the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) to prevent energy industry market manipulation and fraud through such enforcement rules and regulations as that agency prescribes. The FERC has concluded that its energy industry enforcement actions must show a person's or an entity's intent, or scienter, to manipulate or defraud.3 The FERC, its Office of Enforcement (OE), and other energy industry participants therefore should be able to identify scienter.*

Congress expressly patterned EP Act 2005 prohibitions of manipulation and fraud in U.S. energy markets on securities law prohibitions of manipulation and fraud in U.S. securities markets. The FERC declares that its civil prosecutions of energy market manipulation will be guided by U.S. securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) civil enforcement decisions, including the law of alleged manipulator intent or scienter. Scienter is to apply to FERC enforcement just as scienter applies to sec enforcement.5

Besides the SEC's own cases, to help identify scienter or its absence FERC practitioners should employ the many federal court securities law cases with facts showing or failing to show scienter. Federal courts recognize and adjudicate civil class actions by private parties complaining of violations of federal, antifraud securities law, and treat such suits as essential, necessary supplements to SEC civil enforcement and U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) criminal prosecution.6 Private securities litigation functions as an indispensable tool to deter fraud.7 In fact, the U.S. Supreme Court first applied the scienter requirement to securities law enforcement in a private civil action, not an enforcement by the SEC itself.8

Using a heightened pleading standard to promote meritorious private party actions enforcing securities law, the Private securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (PSLRA) amended the Exchange Act to require complainants to show with particularity facts giving rise to a strong inference that the defendant acted with the required state of mind.9 The PSLRA, however, does not change the ultimate standard of proof to be met or the kind of evidence to be adduced for scienter under Exchange Act § 10(b) and SEC Rule 10b-5.10 PSLRA federal court decisions thus apply the same scienter standard of proof, and require the same kind of scienter evidence to be adduced under Exchange Act § 10(b) and SEC Rule 10b-5, as SEC decisions do.11

Like canaries in coal mines, facts from securities law cases, including the very large body of PSLRA cases, can indicate the presence or absence of intent for energy industry prosecutions. PSLRA decisions set out in section IV below teach, among other things, that scienter is not alleged adequately without facts either of motive and opportunity to manipulate markets, or of reckless behavior.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Canaries in the Coal Mine: Facts from Securities Fraud Private Civil Actions Can Identify Intent to Manipulate Energy Markets
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.