Reviews -- Problems of Style by Alois Riegl, Translated by Evelyn Kain and with Annotations and an Introduction by David Castriota and a Preface by Henri Zerner / Forms of Representation in Alois Riegl's Theory of Art by Margaret Olin / and Others

By Brush, Kathryn | The Art Bulletin, June 1994 | Go to article overview

Reviews -- Problems of Style by Alois Riegl, Translated by Evelyn Kain and with Annotations and an Introduction by David Castriota and a Preface by Henri Zerner / Forms of Representation in Alois Riegl's Theory of Art by Margaret Olin / and Others


Brush, Kathryn, The Art Bulletin


ALOIS RIEGL, Problems of Style. Foundations for a History of Ornament, trans. Evelyn Kain, annot. and intro. David Castriota, pref. Henri Zerner, Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1992. Pp. xxxiii + 406; 197 black-and-white ills. $45.00.

MARGARET OLIN, Forms of Representation in Alois Riegl's Theory of Art, University Park, Penn., Pennsylvania State University Press, 1992. Pp. xxiv + 238; 73 black-and-white ills. $42.50.

MARGARET IVERSEN, Alois Riegl: Art History and Theory, Cambridge, Mass., and London, MIT Press, 1993. Pp. ix + 223; 19 black-and-white ills. $29.95.

The Austrian scholar Alois Riegl (1858-1905) was among the most highly nuanced and influential thinkers in the nascent field of art history at the turn of the century. His publications, which included studies of ancient and medieval ornament, late Roman art and Dutch 17th-century painting, made decisive contributions to the theory and methodology of art history. The complex and everchanging conceptual fabric of his writings gave rise to much controversy and to a remarkable range of appropriations by later scholars. Aspects of Riegl's thought affected the work of major Viennese art historians (for instance, the Strukturanalyse developed by Hans Sedlmayr and Guido von Kaschnitz-Weinberg), as well as scholars active both within and beyond the borders of art history, including Wilhelm Worringer, Erwin Panofsky, Walter Benjamin, and Mikhail Bakhtin. Riegl's legacy has also provided significant ongoing stimulus for more recent European and European-trained scholars.(1)

English speakers have tended to be less familiar with Riegl's work than with the research programs of other pioneers of art history such as Heinrich Wolfflin, Aby Warburg, Adolph Goldschmidt, and Emile Male. Until the early 1980s, very little English-language scholarship on Riegl existed, and only about fifty pages of his writings had been translated. In view of this circumstance, the appearance during 1992 and 1993 of three English-language publications on Riegl--two interpretative studies and an annotated translation of one of Riegl's seminal works--constitutes a major event. These studies acquire greater significance in relation to the renewal of interest in he founders of art history manifested on both sides of the Atlantic in recent decades. It is within the context of this broader process of historiographical excavation, and for their contributions to the study of pioneering German-speaking theorists in particular, that the three publications need to be considered here.

For many scholars and students of art history today, the mention of Riegl's name conjures up visions of formalist and linear models of artistic development conceived at a time when the discipline had scientific pretensions. Riegl is also closely identified with the concept of Kunstwollen, which he employed variously in his writings to denote a collective form of artistic will or volition that motivated and shaped the art of specific eras or ethnic groups. Yet these important aspects of Riegl's work do not fully reflect the scope and implications of the problems he addressed in his major studies, including Questions of Style (Stilfragen) of 1893, Late Roman Art Industry (Spatromische Kunstindustrie) of 1901, and The Dutch Group Portrait (Das hollandische Gruppenportrat) published in 1902. Possessing a capacious intellect as well as a highly perceptive eye for the works of art he studied, Riegl grappled with a wide range of theoretical issues, which probed in diverse ways the very nature and purpose of art-historical inquiry.

Consideration of the dynamics of historical development and continuity in artistic monuments--for instance, how and why styles of art come into being and change--was central to Riegl's scholarship. In the course of his investigations, many of which were based on study of anonymous artifacts, Riegl came to argue against hierarchical distinctions between "low" art, or the applied arts, and the "high" arts of architecture, sculpture, and painting. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Reviews -- Problems of Style by Alois Riegl, Translated by Evelyn Kain and with Annotations and an Introduction by David Castriota and a Preface by Henri Zerner / Forms of Representation in Alois Riegl's Theory of Art by Margaret Olin / and Others
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.