Re-Covering the Limits of Recognition: The Politics of Difference and Decolonisation in John Borrows' Recovering Canada: The Resurgence of Indigenous Law

By Bhandar, Brenna | The Australian Feminist Law Journal, December 2007 | Go to article overview

Re-Covering the Limits of Recognition: The Politics of Difference and Decolonisation in John Borrows' Recovering Canada: The Resurgence of Indigenous Law


Bhandar, Brenna, The Australian Feminist Law Journal


RE-COVERING THE LIMITS OF RECOGNITION: THE POLITICS OF DIFFERENCE AND DECOLONISATION IN JOHN BORROWS' RECOVERING CANADA: THE RESURGENCE OF INDIGENOUS LAW

For us, the ownership of the territory is a marriage of the Chief and the land. Each chief has an ancestor who encountered and acknowledged the life of the land. From such encounters come power. The land, the plants, the animals and the people all have spirit, they all must be shown respect. That is the basis of our law.1

I am not a prisoner of history. I should not seek there for the meaning of my destiny.

I should constantly remind myself that the real leap consists in introducing invention into existence.

In the world through which I travel, I am endlessly creating myself.

I am a part of Being to the degree that I go beyond it2

Let's face it. We're undone by each other. And if we're not, we're missing something.3

A 'revolutionary message in a reactionary time'?4 John Borrows' book Recovering Canada: The Resurgence of Indigenous Law, offers us something else- an intricate set of movements that traverse the space between the limits of contemporary political, legal and social structures and their very foundations. Borrows critiques the origins of the settler colonial state and its law, contemporary Aboriginal rights jurisprudence, and government policies that have left Aboriginal communities dispossessed and marginalized. He presents a passionate and nuanced critique of the failure of the recent political and legal recognition of Aboriginal rights to significantly change the lives of Aboriginal communities.5 In the best spirit of critique, Borrows also presents his audience with his vision of a new political and legal order in Canada, one which would not heed the call for increased Aboriginal representation in political, legal, and social institutions, but one that would incorporate Aboriginal law and legal knowledges into existing legal structures. The author attempts, to re-map the boundaries of citizenship to include other ways of being, other forms of governance, other ways of conceptualizing our relationships to land, reources, and each other.

John Borrows' book pushes the boundaries of several different and overlapping bodies of work. One is the existing work on Aboriginal rights in Canada; another is post-colonial literature that addresses issues of (cultural) identity, difference and rights; and third, the more specific literature on the concept of recognition. Borrows' book doesn't remain confined to one of these 'fields' of scholarly inquiry, but pushes the boundaries between them through innovative arguments and analyses.

The body of work on Aboriginal rights in Canada is of course very diverse in perspective, analysis and prescription. Aboriginal rights and legal scholarship necessarily encapsulates a wide range of disciplinary and topical threads. Some people have taken on the task of recovering histories of Aboriginal communities, with a view to re-shaping the dominant historiography of colonial settlement and attendant myths about the state of Aboriginal societies, cultural practices, laws, languages and bodies of knowledge. Other scholars have addressed the legislative and judicial dimensions of colonial settlement;6 the relationship between Aboriginal rights and the nation-state;7 and others, the extent of ongoing development of Aboriginal legal rights in Canadian jurisprudence.8

John Borrows' book is unique in that it addresses the history of colonial settlement, recognizes the myriad injustices levelled at Aboriginal societies, and also seeks to utilize Aboriginal law as a means of showing how the contemporary legacies of colonial settlement could be ameliorated.9 He holds the Supreme Court of Canada accountable for maintaining the fiction of the colonial assertion of sovereignty, and outlines several proposals for how law and 'the political' could be re-conceptualized and radically re-shaped so that Canada could move beyond the strictures of its predicament of being a putadvely post-colonial nation that still carries the hallmarks of injustice that are a direct or indirect result of colonialism. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Re-Covering the Limits of Recognition: The Politics of Difference and Decolonisation in John Borrows' Recovering Canada: The Resurgence of Indigenous Law
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.