The Age of American Unreason/Common Sense: Intelligence as Presented on Popular Television

By Claussen, Dane S. | Journalism & Mass Communication Educator, Spring 2008 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

The Age of American Unreason/Common Sense: Intelligence as Presented on Popular Television

Claussen, Dane S., Journalism & Mass Communication Educator

* Jacoby, Susan (2008). The Age of American Unreason. New York: Pantheon Books, pp. 356.

* Holderman, Lisa (2008). Common Sense: Intelligence as Presented on Popular Television. Lanham, Maryland: Lexington Books, pp. 301.

Two books about anti-intellectualism in U.S. culture generally, and U.S. mass media in particular, take two widely different approaches, yet have at least one major shortcoming in common.

Jacoby's The Age of American Unreason received plenty of play in the mainstream news media and was on the New York Times hardcover bestseller list. (She is the author of seven previous books, including Freethinkers: A History of American secularism.) Her introduction and chapter 1 simultaneously attempt to tie her book to historian Richard Hofstadter's Pulitzer Prize-winning Anti-intellectualism in American Life (1963) while making a case for the United States' supposedly "new antiintellectualism." To her, anti-intellectualism is not new, but it has taken new forms.

The rest of the book's chapter titles are "The Way We Lived Then: Intellect and Ignorance in a Young Nation"; "Social Pseudoscience in the Morning of America's Culture Wars"; "Reds, Pinkos, Fellow Travelers"; "Middlebrow Culture from Noon to Night"; "Blaming It on the Sixties"; "Legacies: Youth Culture and Celebrity Culture"; "The Old-Time Religion"; "Junk Thought"; "The Culture of Distraction"; "Public Life: Defining Dumbness Downward"; and "Cultural Conservation" (conclusion). Her approach, therefore, is a combination of history; commentary on popular culture; specifics of religion, education, politics, and the mass media; and critiques of social science.

Thus, the book's topics mostly overlap with Hofstadter's book, which was strictly a history, divided into four sections on anti-intellectualism in U.S. religion, U.S. education, U.S. business, and U.S. politics, respectively. And if Jacoby never directly addresses anti-intellectualism among business executives or corporations, she offers enough about commercial influences on U.S. culture to say business and economics were included. The title of Jacoby's first chapter, "The Way We Live Now: Just Us Folks," even reminds one of Hofststadter's first chapter, "Anti-intellectualism in Our Time."

But the similarities to Hofstadter's book are not extensive and should not be overstated. Hofstadter's book was and is a masterful history (even if it has been significantly criticized), while much of Jacoby's book is on more or less current events, or at least past recent enough to not yet be "history" with a capital H. Hofstadter's first chapter (and his other discussions of then-current events such as paragraphs on President Kennedy late in chapter 8) seems insincere, even forced, as if his publisher or his conscience or someone else told him that his book couldn't start with his largely theoretical second chapter and had to hold out some hope. One must give Jacoby credit for displaying no false optimism, as the facts and arguments in both her book and Hofstader's don't warrant any, false or otherwise, even if one finds her one-sidedly negative.

Knowledge sociologist Daniel Rigney (1991), among others, has pointed out that the major U.S. "institution" ripe for studying anti-intellectualism in, in both impacting and reflecting U.S. culture, and not addressed by Hofstadter, was the mass media, and Jacoby doesn't make this omission. Sooner or later, her book gets around to newspapers, magazines, television, radio, movies, the Internet, music, and videogames.

Jacoby's book also pales by comparison to Hofstadter's book. Her chapter on "junk thought," which she defines as "anti-rationalism and contempt for countervailing facts and expert opinion," is (as she almost dismissively says about scientific and social scientific studies showing differences between males and females) mostly just that. That's not to say she doesn't make some good points, only that she often doesn't do it very well.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

The Age of American Unreason/Common Sense: Intelligence as Presented on Popular Television


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?