Restraining Federal Preemption When There Is an "Emerging Consensus" of State Environmental Laws and Policies

By Learner, Howard A. | Northwestern University Law Review, January 1, 2008 | Go to article overview

Restraining Federal Preemption When There Is an "Emerging Consensus" of State Environmental Laws and Policies


Learner, Howard A., Northwestern University Law Review


INTRODUCTION

The model of cooperative federalism, which engages both the federal and state governments in setting and meeting environmental goals, has dominated the environmental regulatory field since the 1970s. It integrates national policies and interstate environmental pollution reduction goals with the sensibilities and flexibility of locally tailored actions. Recent trends in federalism jurisprudence, however, have circumscribed both federal and state power to regulate in the environmental arena. Courts' applications of federalism principles to constrict both federal and state solutions can impede the stronger environmental protection that the public is increasingly demanding.

At the same time, Congress and the executive branch have failed to advance key public environmental goals. For example, the federal government has failed both to address global climate change threats and to move aggressively forward on clean energy development solutions. Federal actions to reduce mercury pollution from coal plants and various pollutants from cars and trucks have widely been criticized as too little, too late. The political will for environmental leadership at the federal level has stagnated in the early part of the twenty-first century.

The states are serving as Justice Brandeis's fifty laboratories of democracy.1 They are stepping up to fill this environmental law and policy gap as federal actions have been viewed as insufficient or, in some cases, counterproductive.

For example, more than a dozen states have enacted new statutes or regulatory standards directed at reducing more mercury pollution from coal plants and sooner than the federal standards require.2 Twenty-eight states and the District of Columbia have enacted renewable energy standards requiring utilities to provide an increasing percentage of the power supplied to consumers from wind power, solar energy, and other relatively cleaner "alternative" energy sources.3 Sixteen states are following California in adopting "clean car" standards, designed to reduce carbon dioxide pollution from cars over the next decade,4 and close to twenty states are enacting various forms of legislation, regulations, and executive actions designed to reduce greenhouse gas pollution in order to help solve climate change problems.5

While state governments are exerting greater responsibility for environmental protection in these and other related ways, the federal courts have sometimes applied the Supremacy Clause, federal preemption principles, and dormant commerce clause principles to strike down state laws that are held to conflict with federal law6 or place an undue burden on interstate commerce.7

The balance of federal and state power in the environmental context is being disrupted. State environmental policies can and should be more than merely stronger stop-gap measures. Often these policies are carefully designed and tailored to meet the goals, needs, values, and circumstances of each state. Furthermore, state policies can create significant environmental benefits and experience, particularly when, as now, a large number of states step up to act, producing both cumulative impacts and comparative experiences.

A key question moving forward is how best to preserve the most significant benefits of these state policies over the long term. How and when should the courts and Congress create space for states to act more strongly in the interests of the environment and of their citizens? Moreover, if and when Congress does eventually act on these pressing environmental issues, such as global climate change solutions, how can new federal legislation ensure the integrity of a national regulatory scheme while retaining the strongest elements of existing state measures? Should it matter how many states have stepped up to act when the federal government has not?

This Article focuses on one key point for consideration. When there is an emerging consensus of state legislative actions moving in the same general direction in a particular environmental field, should that influence a reviewing court's application of federal preemption principles? …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Restraining Federal Preemption When There Is an "Emerging Consensus" of State Environmental Laws and Policies
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.