Stress and Stress Management: A Cognitive View

By Pretzer, James L.; Beck, Aaron T. et al. | Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy, Fall 1989 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Stress and Stress Management: A Cognitive View


Pretzer, James L., Beck, Aaron T., Newman, Cory F., Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy


Extreme variability has been observed in individual responses to stressors. It appears that a more detailed analysis of individual variation in cognitions related to stress may result in a greater understanding of their differential responses. An idiographic cognitive model of the psychological processes that mediate stress and that underlie stress management techniques is presented in the form of an illustrative series of hypotheses based on Beck's cognitive model (Beck, Rush, Shaw, & Emery, 1979). The model is presented in detail and is applied to a clinical case example in which traditional nomothetic stress management techniques were ineffective. The advantages and disadvantages of a more idiographic approach to stress are examined as are the implications of the cognitive view of stress for research and practice.

INTRODUCTION

Recent evidence suggesting that stress contributes to the development of disorders ranging from depression (Beck, Rush, Shaw, & Emery, 1979, p. 222; Hammen & deMayo, 1982; Hammen, Mayol, deMayo, & Marks, 1986; Krantz, 1985; Nezu, Nezu, Saraydarian, Kalmar, & Roman, 1986) to cancer (Sklar & Anisman, 1981) to general immuno-Requests for reprints should be directed to James Pretzer, Ph.D., Family Practice Center, Bolwell Health Center, 2078 Abington Rd., Cleveland, OH, 44120. logical dysfunction (Borysenko, 1984; Zegans, 1982) makes it apparent that a clear understanding of stress and methods for managing and reducing stress are needed. Despite the contributions of a number of major theorists and researchers, the current theoretical models (e.g., Lazarus, 1975, 1977, 1982; Shontz, 1965, 1975; Klinger, 1975, 1977; Wortman & Brehm, 1975) have little predictive power when applied to individual cases (Silver & Wortman, 1980). Most of these theoretical models suggest that people will respond to stress with predictable, normative response patterns, and that these responses will occur in orderly sequences of stages. However, empirical studies of reactions to stressors find extreme variability in both the responses observed and the time periods over which these responses occur (see Silver & Wortman, 1980). Overall, leading theories of stress and their corresponding approaches to stress management have been criticized as paying insufficient attention to individual differences (Lazarus & Folkman, 1984).

One of the most basic difficulties in the field has been to adequately define and operationalize the concept of stress (Mason, 1975a). Part of the problem is that the term has been used alternately to describe environmental stimuli (i.e., stress = agent outside the person), the response of the person to environmental stimuli, and the interaction between the two. This lack of consensus on the meaning of stress has resulted in considerable confusion. However, the term has immense public and professional appeal and is therefore too firmly established to be abandoned. In keeping with Mason's (1975b) persuasive recommendations, stress will be used in this article as a collective term to refer to situations in which environmental demands, internal demands, or the combination of the two tax or exceed the person's adaptive capacity. Stressor will be used to refer to the environmental and internal stimuli that require an adaptive response from a person.

Stress researchers have gradually approached a consensus on the view that stress is cognitively mediated (Forsythe & Compas, 1987; Mason, 1975a, 1975b; Singer, 1986; Zegans, 1982). The most widely known view of the role of cognition in stress has been developed by Lazarus (Lazarus, 1975, 1977, 1982; Lazarus, Averill, & Opton, 1970; Lazarus & Folkman, 1984; Lazarus & Launier, 1978). He and his colleagues emphasize the impact that a person's appraisal of situational demands and of responses for coping has on both stress and coping. In this case, stress is seen as being related to a person's perceptions of the magnitude of environmental risks (e.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Stress and Stress Management: A Cognitive View
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?