Discovery in Commercial Arbitration: How Arbitrators Think

By Moxley, Charles J., Jr. | Dispute Resolution Journal, August-October 2008 | Go to article overview

Discovery in Commercial Arbitration: How Arbitrators Think


Moxley, Charles J., Jr., Dispute Resolution Journal


Discovery in arbitration is different from the virtually unlimited discovery process used in litigation. The reason is that the arbitrator's job is to deliver a faster and less expensive process. This article discusses how arbitrators handle discovery in arbitration and the considerations they take into account when deciding how much and what type of discovery to allow. It also discusses the approaches to discovery taken in arbitration rules and the Revised Uniform Arbitration Act.

When a case has been filed in federal or state court, litigators generally have a good idea of what discovery will be allowed. Federal and state rules of civil procedure set forth the standards for discovery in litigation, and a large body of case law elaborates on these standards.

Do we have anything similar in arbitration? Can counsel and the parties know with reasonable certainty how much discovery will be allowed in their commercial arbitration? What kind of discovery is typically permitted? Are the answers to these questions entirely within the discretion of the arbitrator? Is there a governing standard?

Given the confidentiality of arbitration, there are generally no published arbitral decisions on discovery questions in arbitration. So in this article I set forth some tentative answers to these questions in the context of domestic commercial arbitration based on my personal experience as an arbitrator in over 125 commercial cases, the varied experience of arbitrators with whom I have served. I also discuss the relevant rules of the American Arbitration Association (AAA) and other arbitration institutions, as well as the treatment of discovery in the Revised Uniform Arbitration Act (RUAA).

Rationale for Discovery in Arbitration

Arbitrators generally have three primary objectives in deciding discovery disputes in a commercial case: (1) a speedier disposition than in litigation; (2) a less expensive process than litigation; and (3) a fair opportunity for both sides to prepare and try the case. Satisfying each of these objectives depends in large measure on the amount of discovery allowed in the arbitration. To obtain a speedier and less costly disposition, discovery, which consumes the bulk of time and attorney fees in litigation, needs to be more limited than in litigation. Yet the parties must have the discovery they need for a fair hearing.

As a result, the discovery that is automatic and often virtually unlimited in litigation is subject to close scrutiny in arbitration. The arbitration goals cited above cause arbitrators to require the parties to justify the discovery they seek. There is a bedrock amount of discovery in arbitration, particularly the reasonable disclosure of the parties' claims and defenses and the exchange of relevant documents. But beyond that, parties are generally only allowed to take depositions and serve interrogatories if they can demonstrate a real need for them. Of course, the parties' counsel may agree to more extensive discovery, although that can compromise the two main benefits of arbitration.

Discovery in Commercial Litigation

The discovery phase in a multi-million dollar commercial litigation typically takes years, not months. First counsel for the parties prepare and serve very broadly worded document discovery requests that ask to see all documents "in connection with or relating to" one subject or another. They also invariably prepare lengthy interrogatories and sometimes "requests to admit." They have to review and number their client's documents for document production purposes. Often, each side files objections to the other side's document requests, which could include claims of attorney-client privilege or attorney work product. The parties could end up in protracted motion practice fighting about these documents. Meanwhile, each side serves deposition notices on the other. It is not unusual to receive a dozen or even dozens of such notices. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Discovery in Commercial Arbitration: How Arbitrators Think
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.